Ruled in favor of the das office and the subpoena. But they also remanded the case back to the lower courts for additional consideration. This is an hour and 20 minutes. We will hear from trump the vance. The way we will proceed is that each side will have on interrupted arguments. Then there will be questioning in order of that with judge lavalle first then me and then judge. You will begin and you have reserved three minutes for a rebuttal. Thank you your honor and good morning. Good morning. And may it please the court, on remand the president filed and raised two claims, first that the subpoena and overbroad fishing expedition. And second that it was issued in bad faith in order to harass the president. The District Attorney concedes the Supreme Court is author of the president bring these claims in federal court on remand. The only issue then, on appeal, is whether the allegations of bad faith or plausible. The District Courts determination that they are not could be reversed for
The court heard arguments from the president s attorney in the manhattan District Attorneys office. The central issue surrounds the subpoena for the president s finances as part of an investigation into alleged misconduct i the president s company, the Trump Organization. This is the second time this case has appeared before the court. The first was in october of 2019. It ended up before the u. S. Supreme court in may of 2020 and the justices ultimately ruled in favor of the das office and subpoena. But also remanded the case back to the lower courts for additional consideration. This is one hour and 20 minutes. 20 minutes. We will hear from trump the vance. The way we will proceed is that each side will have on interrupted arguments. Then there will be questioning in order of that with judge lavalle first then me and then judge. You will begin and you have reserved three minutes for a rebuttal. Thank you your honor and good morning. Good morning. And may it please the court, on remand
Interrupted arguments. Then there will be questioning in order of that with judge lavalle first then me and then judge. You will begin and you have reserved three minutes for a rebuttal. Thank you your honor and good morning. Good morning. And may it please the court, on remand the president filed and raised two claims, first that the subpoena and overbroad fishing expedition. And second that it was issued in bad faith in order to harass the president. The District Attorney concedes the Supreme Court is author of the president bring these claims in federal court on remand. The only issue then, on appeal, is whether the allegations of bad faith or plausible. The District Courts determination that they are not could be reversed for several reasons. First, the court stacked the deck against the president by serving these president s are disguised attempt to re litigate category community. The District Attorney also concedes they claim they are no not. The clot plausibility standard to be
University in washington dc. Good evening. This thing has got to come down lower for me. How are all of you . Happy new year, thank you for being here. I am one of the coowners of politics and prose bookstore, lissa muscatine. Thank you. Along with my coowner and husband brad grant who is somewhere in the front and our fabulous wonderful staff, welcome all of you to tonights event in our Nations Capital and on the campus of George Washington university. I mention our location because think about it, we are at an Institution Name for our nations first president and only blocks from the Nerve Centers of american government, the white house and congress so what better venue for a conversation with tonights guest speaker, senator Kamala Harris spends her days on capitol hill and you are not alone if you think in a couple years she might be taking up residence at the other end of pennsylvania avenue. Since her election to the United States senate in 2016 senator harris has emerged as one of
On pharma. Eli lilly with earnings. Novo nordisk, the drug cutting risk of heart attack and stroke by 20 well talk to mr. Irgin and echo star ceo a day after s p and nasdaq broke the fourday losing streak, stocks back in the red financials in focus among laggards after moodys talking about Interest Rate and asset liability risk. Whats incredible is we just went through the quarters. With the exception of, honestly, key, the quarters were good. A lot of them had inflows. People thought there would be outflows david, when you see these kinds of downgrades, dont you see yes, yes, yes. Good, good, good. Done, done, done move on, move on, move on. You cant pay for this kind of analysis. No, you really cant. Its important because financials represent a huge part of the market, and if were going to have blending, we cant have as much lending thats kind of what were saying my problem with it is it doesnt jive with the facts. It was entirely possible, entirely possible we could have been in a s