closing arguments are about commenting on the material relevant facts and evidence, applying the law to those facts and making the argument about how the facts finder h, the jud should interpret that all together. that s what the judge said the former president had to do. what he couldn t do is giving a campaign speech, attacking the judge, attacking the judge s wife, attacking the law clerk. not only did the former president not abide by the deadlines, but chose not to come, shows you what the former president wanted to do is a campaign speech and not a closing argument. no doubt he ll speak outside the courtroom. remind people what s at stake in this case. some of it s already been decided by this judge, no jury here. but some crucial parts will be decided now. the short answer is the future of the trump organization. i mean, the entire ability of the trump org to continue doing business is what s at stake here. this is a civil lawsuit brought by the new york state attorney gener