Themes is that we have hetchy power, we have firmed up hetchy power that we can sell. So, i think by providing and selling power to customers, more customers, get us to that point and i think were definitely going to pursue that because thats what we normally do anyway, so im saying there is a way we can green light cleanpowersf going forward. If you can increase your service for wholesale customers, but perhaps an overlap between cleanpowersf around staffing might help minimize costs you can minimally. They can Work Together. If there are no other comments or questions from colleagues, we can go on to Public Comment on this item. Public comment is open on this item. Any member of the public would like to come forward . Good afternoon again, commissioners. Eric brooks representing San Francisco green party and the local Grassroots Organization, our city, and San Francisco Clean Energy Advocates which is a coalition working to move forward cleanpowersf. So, its really important after th
So, since we last met jointly which was in july 9th, thats when the rate issue was brought before you and was [speaker not understood]. The commission has met and determined that based upon that meeting there were some concerns that were raised by commissioners and the public. And our commission determined that it would be a good idea in order to proceed to try to answer some of those questions. And the three main issues were the issues of jobs and local economy. The issue of the shell contract itself, and whether or not that was a good contract, and then most importantly what was the build out. So, the rfp that ha been issued by lafco, tried to answer those three questions along with some other issues that came up. So, the rfp was prepared by lafco staff, but it relies heavily on documents that had either been approved by the board of supervisors or the draft cleanpowersf build out road map and strategies that was dated june 2013 and other reports that had been presented to the s. F.
The commission has met and determined that based upon that meeting there were some concerns that were raised by commissioners and the public. And our commission determined that it would be a good idea in order to proceed to try to answer some of those questions. And the three main issues were the issues of jobs and local economy. The issue of the shell contract itself, and whether or not that was a good contract, and then most importantly what was the build out. So, the rfp that ha been issued by lafco, tried to answer those three questions along with some other issues that came up. So, the rfp was prepared by lafco staff, but it relies heavily on documents that had either been approved by the board of supervisors or the draft cleanpowersf build out road map and strategies that was dated june 2013 and other reports that had been presented to the s. F. P. U. C. And to the lafco commission. The tasks that are asked for in the rfp follow almost directly those that the sfpuc staff had iden
Was a good contract, and then most importantly what was the build out. So, the rfp that ha been issued by lafco, tried to answer those three questions along with some other issues that came up. So, the rfp was prepared by lafco staff, but it relies heavily on documents that had either been approved by the board of supervisors or the draft cleanpowersf build out road map and strategies that was dated june 2013 and other reports that had been presented to the s. F. P. U. C. And to the lafco commission. The tasks that are asked for in the rfp follow almost directly those that the sfpuc staff had identified approximately one year ago. So, the goal of the buildout obviously was to answer the questions and to provide a plan to improve electric power to the citizens and businesses he within San Francisco. Obviously the project objectives have not changed with cleanpowersf, that is to reduce energy costs, create higher Renewable Energy sources for the citizens of this city, to reduce exposure
That it would be a good idea in order to proceed to try to answer some of those questions. And the three main issues were the issues of jobs and local economy. The issue of the shell contract itself, and whether or not that was a good contract, and then most importantly what was the build out. So, the rfp that ha been issued by lafco, tried to answer those three questions along with some other issues that came up. So, the rfp was prepared by lafco staff, but it relies heavily on documents that had either been approved by the board of supervisors or the draft cleanpowersf build out road map and strategies that was dated june 2013 and other reports that had been presented to the s. F. P. U. C. And to the lafco commission. The tasks that are asked for in the rfp follow almost directly those that the sfpuc staff had identified approximately one year ago. So, the goal of the buildout obviously was to answer the questions and to provide a plan to improve electric power to the citizens and bu