Which was the Planning Department recommendation or the Planning Department version all make those as described and roman numeral the Planning Department with user as sponsor and table item 4. Thats correct. So why dont we do that now supervisor mar has described a series of amendments reduced to writing as well why dont we have a motion to make those amendments item number 3 . Okay well take that without objection. Well adapt those amendments item 3 and madam clerk if you could add supervisor mar as the author of item 3 and can i have a motion to table item number 4 okay well take that without objection. Item 4 is tabled now were working with the amended version of item number 3 so i just want to say a few things and make the amendments ill briefly describe at the beginning so this amended version obviously no one got exactly what they wanted with the compromise and a number of things not everything is exactly the way i would have done it but weve made a lot of process in particular i
Lee i didnt see on castro street or the old turn over records massive location people thought were going to stay vacant had a lot of support but then we had robust conversation about starbuck and it was denied so my one of the proposals the process works the Community Weighs in and the Planning Commission makes a decision a number im supportive of the proposals today and the amendments outlined by supervisor mar it will provide a Even Stronger and Better Process whats challenging is that a lot of times when we hear push back against formula retail zoning controls it is not necessarily push back against the concept of having the community be able to weigh in with an opinion theres pretty broad support for making sure people weigh in but what we hear is its not related to formula retail but related to the fact our conditional use process is broken its not broken because of the Community Input thats not broken at all but broken because the process takes so long and so not just in the roll
Rights when those Companies Come in insuring they provide jobs because we all care about the jobs that are variable so it looks like it will go forward and look forward to working with you in the future. Thank you very much. Next speaker. Supervisor wiener and supervisor mar and supervisor cohen my name is michelle im from jobs for justice were here to support supervisor mars ordinance and updated language and in addition to what connie said we supported workers rights for formula retail that if the businesses want to come into San Francisco they should also have Higher Standards to protect san franciscan who are working in those industries so we just stand in support of the legislation. Thank you very much mr. Wormer. Good afternoon, supervisors its excelling sdroipt i dont have to go through my long list of crafted points laughter that i thank you to supervisor mar and other supervisors for crafting i think what sounds like a very good piece of legislation i looked forward to read it
Series of amendments reduced to writing as well why dont we have a motion to make those amendments item number 3 . Okay well take that without objection. Well adapt those amendments item 3 and madam clerk if you could add supervisor mar as the author of item 3 and can i have a motion to table item number 4 okay well take that without objection. Item 4 is tabled now were working with the amended version of item number 3 so i just want to say a few things and make the amendments ill briefly describe at the beginning so this amended version obviously no one got exactly what they wanted with the compromise and a number of things not everything is exactly the way i would have done it but weve made a lot of process in particular i was pleased to see the Environmental Review Environmental Review study i was concerned the original proposal in supervisor mar the Environmental Review Environmental Review study was manipulative broad and the formula retail establishments could get caught up in an