criminal investigation of something that began in secret and revered institutions of the u.s. government that s frightening. what it means is subpoena power and a grand jury to investigate whether or not a crime or crimes have been committed. and if a grand jury and prosecutor defrm determine that they have, criminal charges will be brought. you had kellyanne conway on before. i don t think americans truly should be concerned about an investigation. you have investigations to determine whether or not there has been criminal misconduct. that s why you have professionals conduct those investigations with the required degree of independence from the political process in order to make judgments that are not based on politics but based on the merits. you know, john durham enjoys a bipartisan reputation up to now. but i hope what we don t see is what i m anticipating we will see. there are already calls for the attorney general to recuse himself. that s ridiculous.
tried to work with those outlets. we really have. there was a point when i have gone through point by point with people to say even on the record this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong. they choose to go with anonymous sources. far be it from me to attack the new york times and washington post . i read them all the time. the president and his aides have a freedom of choice to read what they want. i think every minute that the president and his staff and americans everywhere watching this now spend on foxnews.com getting their news is i m joking. that s the only place they can go. spend more time at foxnews.com. the new york times. it s a free market. people should be able to read what they want. won t go broke by those cancellations. every government employee is interested in reading the washington post will get it at home and read it online. it won t have an impact. the president wants an impact. he will make it more difficult.
it s not another monopoly product? jon: given what happened in the 2016 elections and russians meddling in the elections, can you really be sure that a system like that will be safe? i think it s challenging and i think the most important thing that mark zuckerberg told the house was he will not participate in libra or lead libra or open up in any country of the world unless he gets full u.s. regulatory approval. that should bring comfort to americans and i think it allows us to think about the future which will include a digital token and block chain in your future. they re innovators. we don t want to stifle innovation but want to make sure it s done in the right way. jon: do you think they should be verifying the accuracy of a rds? i don t think it s possible. we have a first amendment right to have political speech. the issue should be let people take that responsibility