there are too many elitism s. it s so outrageous. that s the old bubble of, the late tom wolf said america is in the middle, the coast of the parentheses. an ihink he knows what he talking about. i think you could find that in any party, and everything that doug schoen said i could show you a clip from 2010 that says the same thing about the republican part party. right, that s why we have donald trump and his historic victory. we have the situations where, there is an insurgent s coming on right there in the democratic party. it slightly to the left of where it s been and that will have to bring a lot of energyit it and it will sweep the power. we will have our own will legal marts get elected that year and people will say, how is that person a congressperson.
in season have been forced to let politics enter even that day. and what do you see is happening to the process now? how far have we gotten from the reason of the protest in the first place? ihink the protest you know, brian, the protests have always been clear. colin kaepernick, everyone involved has said, loo protests are about police brutality and institutiona racism. the players have said that consistently, that that is the motivation behind them taking a knee or any kind of protest that they engaged in. and the president of the united states and certain members of the right have simply refused to listen to it. it s not an issue of they just disagree. they ve simply said we refuse to listen to what you re saying is the motivation behind your protest. and the problem the sort of larger cultural probthat i ve seen with this is it turns sundays, which used to be a fun day i m a seahawks fan, a former eagles fan. it s taken a fun day and turned a litical wedgsue. now you have peo
but to add to the simple answer, not only that, chris, almost every head of state has the same immunity. the head of state has to be out of office, then you can prosecute them. i get the process. totally irrelevant in his case. he didn t do anything wrong. my question is, you could have made the example with any hypothetical you wanted. you chose shooting jim comey. ihink i chose it. i think that was the one that was suggested. maybe i could have said let s use another one. maybe. i m sure you ll get another chance. the last thing we need is more gasoline on the fire, right? more reason for people to have unduly hostile views of the people in our department of justice. and when you set something up like that, a lot of people start talking about the in terms that people don t need, you understand? probably not the right analogy. although technically i believe correct, although there is dispute about it. and i think that was selected by somebody else, not me.
not just people who are defenders of the president. ihink his attacks are small minded. they are incredibly shortsighted. they improve the preceptial of the community. if that s what he s trying to do he needs to come up with a better strategy. he hates the president and opposed to winning politically. he s doing what he can to harm the president in any way possible. i totally agree. they just can t believe president trump won and the brexit happened. after the break, the big debate. as the establishment democrats pushed california as a model for the rest of the country. governor jerry brown is killing california. my way do you still think i m crazy standing here today
ihink that is something he s going to have to decide. thorough aressive confirmation hearings are not new. i was here as a senator under the obama administration. we certainly had long confirmation processes when president obama was president, republicans were in control of the senate. i think it s part of our senate oral role. it is about decisions that will be made that have a big impact on war and peace and whether or not we create another generation of veterans in potential conflicts whether with north korea or iran. on that note, let s talk about what happened with the nomination of mike pompeo for secretary of state. you changed your vote from no on the committee to present. why did you do that? well, alisyn, to be clear, it didn t change the outcome. it only changed the our. in committee i voted against cia director mike pompeo to be the next secretary of state. and on the floor i will vote against him. but my friend and colleague