from ukraine s point of view a shortage of ammo. he rather says that this is a situation where they have failed to capture this city. they have been fighting here for eight months and now in his move, pregosian is trying to make up for the failures on the fighting line. ukraine s deputy defense minister says russia in her view is, and this is the language she used, desperately trying to seize bakhmut by tuesday, may 9th, the victory holiday you mentioned. russia is moving wagner fighters from other directions and replacing them with para trooper assault units currently fighting in the bakhmut direction. this language we have seen, it is surprising given the circumstances. this is someone who has been an important part of russia s fight in the east particularly when it comes to the city of bakhmut. we have seen and heard reports
conservative members of the news media have pushed salacious theories about paul pelosi. the alleged attacker and his motives. prompting california governor gavin newsom to hit back accusing fox a fox host of, quote, aiding and enabling that vitriol that caused the assault. and don noises democrats. this week, donald trump shared baseless conspiracies about the attack on the conservative radio show, despite knowing how these conspiracies have real life consequences. just look at the events of january the 6th. historian matthew dialogue describes these recent events as examples of, quote, the fighting line between a rhetorical extremism and political violence. and the new york times op-ed gallic writes the anti government rhetoric from the reagan era to the maga movement is, quote, casts the government
conservative politician. clearly, the use conservative politician. clearly, the use of conservative politician. clearly, the use of socialist is slightly ridiculous but it reflects a key to fighting ridiculous but it reflects a key to fighting line. dividing line. it fighting line. dividing line. [it does fighting line. dividing line. does mean fighting line. dividing line. it does mean you can differentiate between them on those issues. anne, on the i, calls for a clean campaign. penny mourdant feels like she s been under attack. that is true. there s been a bit of a pylon on penny mourdant, but it is also technically inevitable at this stage that the gloves are going to come off. we might be wrong, but the numbers of mps backing ray she sunak. and penny mourdant is in
it was quite clear that he was convinced that the ukrainians were going to be greeting the russian soldiers with bottles of vodka. they were greeted with bottles of flammable liquids, that would be molotov cocktails. so in the book to risk it all we talk about the need for decisionmakers to be very clear-eyed about facts. and putin on the other side of that fighting line, of course, is volodymyr zelenskyy who i think has a crystal clear view of the threat to this nation and what needs to be done in it. really, at a contrast in risk between these two individuals. i think that s perhaps the greatest advantage that zelenskyy enjoys. admiral, i can t believe i have to ask you this question again, there are republicans who seem to be going weak in the knees. there are republicans who are starting to suggest that we need to just give up. that we need to just turn
that s, if you will, the good news for the russians. the bad news for the russians, however, is the fact that the weapons logistics flow from the west has just accelerated. the russian logistics chain is not going to be a lot better. it will be somewhat better because they have fewer a smaller level of offensive forces to support. so bottom line, jonathan, they will get some benefit out of this contraction. but the heart of this thing is the resistance, the will and the spirit on both sides of that fighting line. the ukrainian could not be higher. the russian side of this could not be worse in terms of conscripts, reservists. their actions, all of that is extremely demoralizing to a military fighting force. so the bottom line in all of