resonating with a base and with beyond a base, a democratic broad electorate who has criticized the president tactically for conciliating too much, for giving up too much, more being too unreasonable against an unreasonable opponent? mark schmidt had an interesting piece in the new republic where he referred to the president s fighting bipartisanship as opposed to other kinds of bipartisanship. i think the base likes the fact that this package to get the economy moving is bigger than they expected it to be and they like the fact he s fighting for it. but the ideas, themselves, are fundamentally bipartisan. so you had the odd spectacle of paul krugman and david brooks both praising this. one liked the bipartisan side. the other liked the fighting side. so maybe he can win re-election. e.j. dionne, senior fellow at the brookings institute and washington post columnist. stick a pin in that. we will be coming back to that assertion momentarily i m sure.
resonating with a base and with beyond a base, a democratic broad electorate who has criticized the president tactically for conciliating too much, for giving up too much, more being too unreasonable against an unreasonable opponent? mark schmidt had an interesting piece in the new republic where he referred to the president s fighting bipartisanship as opposed to other kinds of bipartisanship. i think the base likes the fact that this package to get the economy moving is bigger than they expected it to be and they like the fact he s fighting for it. but the ideas, themselves, are fundamentally bipartisan. so you had the odd spectacle of paul krugman and david brooks both praising this. one liked the bipartisan side. the other liked the fighting side. so maybe he can win re-election. e.j. dionne, senior fellow at the brookings institute and washington post columnist. stick a pin in that. we will be coming back to that
do you think that it s resonating with a base and with beyond a base, a democratic broad electorate who has criticized the president tactically for conciliating too much, for giving up too much, more being too unreasonable against an unreasonable opponent? mark schmidt had an interesting piece in the new republic where he referred to the president s fighting bipartisanship as opposed to other kinds of bipartisanship. i think the base likes the fact that this package to get the economy moving is bigger than they expected it to be and they like the fact he s fighting for it. but the ideas, themselves, are fundamentally bipartisan. so you had the odd spectacle of paul krugman and david brooks both praising this. one liked the bipartisan side. the other liked the fighting side. so maybe he can win re-election. e.j. dionne, senior fellow at the brookings institute and washington post columnist. stick a pin in that. we will be coming back to that assertion momently i m sure. the