to me that anything they would be legitimately be looking into couldn t be public or they could take a small portion into closed session. so james comey s attorney calls the subpoena process an abusive process, a divergence from house rules, and its presumption of transparency. what s the case they have to prove here? as laura said, they re clearly willing to take this to court. what s most likely to happen, especially considering the timing of the turnover of the committee, is the clock is going to run out. so you know, they have a subpoena outstanding. david kelly, the lawyer for jim comey, will challenge the subpoena, and you know, you ll take it to court, but in reality, they re going to get a court date a couple weeks out. by the time this all starts to shake out, the clock will run out and the dems will take over the committee and probably withdraw the subpoena or at the very least make the subpoena make the hearing a public one. how long could this fight go on? you think
china s bad acting but let s face it china has been stealing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of our industrial secrets as well as our military secrets and that is really i think the biggest threat that we face in terms of our relationship with china. maria: so how long will this fight go on and what are the implications if we continue pushing back on china? what are the implications for the economy, for people, because we know that they ve been steal ing for all of these years but they won t admit it. are tariffs the answer here to get them to behave differently? well, our vulnerability to cyber taxes is going to go on as long as people use computers. i tell young people if you want job security, get a degree in cybersecurity. so again, i think the good news is because of public awareness, the gap between those on offense and those of us on defense is quite honestly narrowing and i think this administration appropriately is studying the fact that potentially going on offense ou
china s bad acting but let s face it china has been stealing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of our industrial secrets as well as our military secrets and that is really i think the biggest threat that we face in terms of our relationship with china. maria: so how long will this fight go on and what are the implications if we continue pushing back on china? what are the implications for the economy, for people, because we know that they ve been steal ing for all of these years but they won t admit it. are tariffs the answer here to get them to behave differently? well, our vulnerability to cyber taxes is going to go on as long as people use computers. i tell young people if you want job security, get a degree in cybersecurity. so again, i think the good news is because of public awareness, the gap between those on offense and those of us on defense is quite honestly narrowing and i think this administration appropriately is studying the fact that potentially going on
people dead, as those people at the country music festival in vegas. those are all thingshat we can talk about and we can lead on, and we don t have to reference trump. although, he will be in a position where he will be defending those. we need him on the defense. are you in the camp, willie, that believes democrats should not be talking about impeachment at this time? i think impeachment is a waste of time, but believe me, let robert mueller handle the impeachment issue. let him do the confrontation with trump. let him try to force trump to be interviewed. let him continue to exhaust giuliani s presentations. let that fight go on. that s internal. let them go at it. in the meantime, we ought to be ringing the doorbells of everybody on the democratic side of the aisle who didn t go out to vote for hillary clinton. we ought to be trying to convince bernie sanders to go back and stay in his own state and leave the rest of the nation
himself. i hope mr. giuliani was being truthful because that would be a scare situation us and our family. alex, on that particular point, keep coming back to what trey gowdy said. if the president really is innocent and did nothing wrong, why did they all act so guilty? why are they so afraid of having him testify and facing robert mueller or having this investigation go on? it just to me it doesn t really add up. just a quick word also on the pardons, i ve got to say there was no need to pardon joe arpaio or no need to pardon scooter libby. there certainly was no need to pardon de souza making money as a comment ator. these parts were to send a message to his friends, paul man ma nort, michael flynn maybe,