And it is pretty clear those options are as i just outlined it. Does that mean he couldnt find trump in violation of some other statute that has not been briefed before him . Nobody has also said im not going to summarily find contempt. These are things you have to bring before me. He has made it very clear. These are not summary proceedings. Unless he actually does it in front of me, im not going to do it on my own volition. We could keep going. , we shouldnt. That will do it for us for now. Now it is time for the last word with our good friend lawrence odonnell. Good evening. Good evening, rachel. We have convened our own version of the last word Supreme Court. In it, including Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe, Andrew Weissman is here with us. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has a few things to say about it too and he will be joining us. Looking forward to it, lawrence. We learned today the United States Supreme Court has two different kinds of justices. Justices who are trying to pro
Nuclear capacity, or the wrong is building general wesley clark. Thank you. Jeremy diamond as well. Thanks. Thats it for us. The news continues. Have a great weekend. The source of Kaitlan Collins starts now striping the source tonight. Donald trump pressing his luck with the jury that will decide his fate, His Historic First Criminal Trial Set to begin 72 two hours from now, as the judge overseeing it just denied another attempt to delay it. Also an Election Integrity stun House Speaker mike johnson, making the Pilgrimage Tamara Logo today in an effort to salvage his speakership. Also hyping a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in federal elections, which guess what . This is already illegal and our source tonight is one of those popular authors of all time, bestselling legend James Patterson out with a new page turner that could help turn the page and the war on books in america. Im Kaitlan Collins, and this is the source the first. Former president in us history to ever face a crim
anyone. it s really interesting here. of course, as we know this is a majority of conservative court in this case, two dissents five in favor to we don t know how they voted. what do you make of this? i think this demonstrates what a different case this was then what the justices did in june when they rolled back a half century of abortion rights. this case has to do with the authority of the fda to regulate and make its own scientific determinations for drugs. so i think the biden administration made a very compelling case for the chaos that would arise if the supreme court did not put these lower court orders and hold. secondly, though, if you go back to the june decision in dobbs, the justices said, then specifically and even samuel alito wrote. the court was sending it back to the states and justice kavanaugh, who apparently provided the key fifth vote. made an effort in a separate statement to say we are
we know this is a majority of conservative court in this case. two dissents five in favor to we don t know how they voted. what do you make of this? i think this demonstrates what a different case this was then what the justices did in june when they rolled back a half century of abortion rights. this case has to do with the authority of the fda to regulate and make its own scientific determinations for drugs. so i think the biden administration made a very compelling case for the chaos that would arise if the supreme court did not put these lower court orders and hold. secondly though, if you go back to the june decision in dobbs, the justices said, then specifically and even samuel alito wrote. the court was sending it back to the states and justice kavanaugh, who apparently provided the key fifth vote. made an effort in a separate statement to say we are specifically not outlawing