By Benjamin Cox on May 25, 2021 at 4:19pm
The remapping of Illinois continues to draw critics, this time for new maps of the Illinois Supreme Court.
Illinois’ Supreme Court district maps have not been redrawn since 1963. The Senate and House Redistricting Committees today released a proposed map of new Illinois Supreme Court boundaries. House and Senate Democrats say that it brings the districts into compliance with the state’s population shifts.
According to a press release today, the maps is allegedly equalizing the population and demographic shifts that have occurred in the state of Illinois over the course of the last sixty years. Currently, population fluctuates greatly between districts. According to the release’s statistics, the current Second District contains 3.2 million people, while the current Fourth and Fifth Districts contain under 1.3 million people. The map was drawn using the American Community Survey’s 5 year population estimate from 201
Gubernur Kaltim Isran Noor Sebut Kukar, Kutim dan Mahulu Berpotensi Karhutla, Ini Alasannya
tribunnews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tribunnews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Gubernur Kaltim Isran Noor Nilai tak Perlu Pergub dalam Memberi Hukuman Pelaku Karhutla
tribunnews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tribunnews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
In an opinion issued on December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court resolved a certified conflict between several of the Florida appellate courts as to whether borrowers who prevail on an argument that the lender lacked standing at the time of filing of a foreclosure complaint can recover their attorneys fees as the prevailing party. In
Page v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, et al., Case No. SC19-1137 (Fla. Dec. 31, 2020), the Florida Supreme Court answered that question with a clear and decisive YES.
The Court determined that the fee-shifting provision outlined in Florida Statute, §57.105(7) allows prevailing borrowers to recover attorneys fees when the underlying mortgage contract contains a unilateral fee provision. The Court found that the issue boiled down to statutory interpretation, and that borrowers cannot be prohibited from using the fee-shifting argument to recover fees, even if there is a determinat