VIRTUE ONLINE? Virtue Online, via Alice C. Linsley, take the ad hominem approach in "Talley Cross: Another Raving Feminist", an article punctuated throughout with mocking condescension and contempt. This behavior raises serious questions about their lack of self-awareness and self-discipline in respect to their conduct online.
VIRTUE ONLINE? Virtue Online, via Alice C. Linsley, take the ad hominem approach in "Talley Cross: Another Raving Feminist", an article punctuated throughout with mocking condescension and contempt. This behavior raises serious questions about their self-awareness and self-discipline in respect to their conduct online.
I am going to allow you 5 minutes of supervised masturbation for the week.
But before I do this I lecture you on why male subs should be restricted to infrequent sexual release and little pleasure and WHY you should be made to eat your cum.
I then start the timer for 5 mins and give you orders to masturbate until I say stop! I thoroughly enjoy mocking you throughout.. And then you MUST eat anything that comes out!
I spend the rest of the video dishing out the harshest mockery and shaming for eating your own cum but why it was INCREDIBLY important for you to do so!
I take great enjoyment out of lecturing you (my sub) about appropriate behaviour with food.
I explain why as a sub I require you to be hungry at all times as a sign of submission and respect for women.
Why as a male you are required to remain fit to be visually pleasing to me (your superior).
I lecture you on why it is unacceptable for you to be waited upon by a woman, why a woman SHOULD NOT under ANY circumstances serve you food and how you are NOT allowed to eat without permission in a woman's presence.
HUNGER is your constant reminder of your inferiority as part of the male race.
GAFCon’s censure of other Anglicans for dismissing Scripture on issues of sexuality seems absurd when you consider that GAFCon is dominated by male clergy, many of whom abuse Scripture to justify excluding women from clerical leadership. In fact, GAFCon's 2019 report on Women in the Episcopate sanctions male supremacy by advising against the consecration of female bishops. How can Anglicans speak authoritatively and compellingly on issues of gender and sexuality when we simultaneously distort scripture to sanctify female submission, in a similar way that scripture was distorted to sanctify slavery?