that these are repeat offenders. they are free to in this case kill a girl ten years ago. is this enough for you? you explained it right. we re talking about felons, serious criminals. these are people who have committed very serious crimes against society and the fact of the matter is, once they re arrested, convicted, they shouldn t be in the united states. we re not talking ant questioning the general legal status. that s a whole other debate. here i just can t fathom why anyone would be against this. if someone s committed a serious crime, obviously in the case of kate s law, that particular person had multiple felony offenses, then commits this outrageous homicide and murdered this young woman.
is that you have to adhere to the laws of the federal government and among those laws is if you are here illegally you can t be and you certainly can t protect those who are here illegally or make it difficult for authorities to find them. well, absolutely. and san francisco is the city where kate steinle s murderer found refuge after being dee dee ported multiple times with several felony offenses. i m not an attorney but the illegal immigration reform act of 1996 makes it pretty clear that states and municipalities have to assist and comply with the federal government and immigration requests. it was also under president obama that his own solicitor general wrote a report essentially saying that sanctuary cities are in violation of federal law and, thus, can be withheld federal funding. i suspect that the white house, i have not seen anything out from the white house yet, but i suspect that they will continue to fight this in court.
people are registering. another situation where federal law doesn t necessary line up with state law. three or four other examples. marijuana being another one. let s move the top two. california, a new law makes it more difficult to deport convicted you will legals and convicted immigrants. what s jerry brown going here for, sir? well, what this new law does in california is it says if you are it applies actually more often to people who are legally here and federal law, if you are convicted of certain felony offenses, including drug offenses, you are supposed to be deported. what california is trying to do is undermine the federal law by erasing the conviction even though the person was actually convicted. and it s just another example of california trying to undermine our immigration laws. sounds like california wants to be not a group of sanctuary cities, geraldo, it wants to be a sanctuary state. i disagree with the secretary s
people are registering. another situation where federal law doesn t necessary line up with state law. three or four other examples. marijuana being another one. let s move the top two. california, a new law makes it more difficult to deport convicted you will legals and convicted immigrants. what s jerry brown going here for, sir? well, what this new law does in california is it says if you are it applies actually more often to people who are legally here and federal law, if you are convicted of certain felony offenses, including drug offenses, you are supposed to be deported. what california is trying to do is undermine the federal law by erasing the conviction even though the person was actually convicted. and it s just another example of california trying to undermine our immigration laws. sounds like california wants to be not a group of sanctuary cities, geraldo, it wants to be a sanctuary state. i disagree with the secretary s
law of the state in which people are registering. another situation where federal law doesn t necessary line up with state law. three or four other examples. marijuana being another one. let s move the top two. california, a new law makes it more difficult to deport convicted you will legals and convicted immigrants. what s jerry brown going here for, sir? well, what this new law does in california is it says if you are it applies actually more often to people who are legally here and federal law, if you are convicted of certain felony offenses, including drug offenses, you are supposed to be deported. what california is trying to do is undermine the federal law by erasing the conviction even though the person was actually convicted. and it s just another example of california trying to undermine our immigration laws. sounds like california wants to be not a group of sanctuary cities, geraldo, it wants to be a sanctuary state. i disagree with the secretary s