that this is just an opportunity for james comey to save face? well, let me give you a little background about myself. i was an stability district attorney many alabama. helped to manage the grand jury and had dozens of felony jury trials. then later difference district attorney of madison county, alabama of supervised the grand jury trials. so i have some prosecutorial experience and i ll going to break this down into two arenas. on the legal side, it was a clear slam-dunk win for president obama excuse me, president trump and the white house. by way of example, no evidence of any kind of collusion with the russians. donald trump is cleared on that. number two, with respect to these allegations of obstruction of justice, it is quitelear there s no evidence that whateverhe president said or did hampered or retarded or hindered in any way what the fbi investigation was doing. so legal arena, big victory for
quite frankly i should not know. this investigation should be conducted by the fbi or any other investigative agency in a close to the vest fashion until such time as they make a decision whether to go forward or not. from a defense attorney perspective f you perspective, if you re going to have someone who is involved in an investigation, you should always does for immunity. i don t know if there s a reason, ie, i committed a crime and i want pro tektek protectio. i say that with having been a prosecutor where i prosecuted felony jury trials and helped organize the grand jury for the district attorney or when i was district attorney of madison county for a couple years which is where hunts vville alabama i. the fbi director james comey told the house intelligence