keepers did not do any violence, did not attack police officers. no, they don t jon, that s actually incorrect according to this indictment. it talks about them forcibly pushing into the capitol and past law enforcement. so that s just a misrepresentation of what s going on. you re talking about tough talk here. there s more than tough talk. there s talk about essentially overthrowing a government. and there are new things here. there are a lot of signal communications, including with your clients, that paint a very clear picture of what happened before the insurrection, during, and after. well, outside the indictment they admit they didn t damage any property. they claimed they organized some of that. which in court the entire document has to be put before the court, not snippets of things. there i read the indictment, jon. it says they forcibly pushed
help by paying some of what medicare doesn t. and let you see any doctor. any specialist. anywhere in the u.s. who accepts medicare patients. so if you have this. consider adding this. call unitedhealthcare today for your free decision guide. the supreme court has blocked the biden administration s vaccine mandate impacting some 80 million workers. but the justices gave the green light to another that will impact far fewer people. the court blocked a regulation forcing large employers to require vaccines or regular testing along with masks. but it is allowing a vaccine mandate for certain healthcare workers. the decision on private employers is a blow to the president s efforts to tackle the pandemic and could signal a larger effort by the court to
come to capitol on the northeast corner. he was calling them to join in. we all knew what was happening at that point, jon. remember, they had a permit on the supreme court side no. jon, you just said the training was not about january 6th. it clearly was. they got training on september 30 in florida. they claim it was paramilitary training, which is illegal in florida. and they said we didn t train them. we did standard gun training on september 30. you ask how i respond to it. they are serious charges. but how i respond is putting the entire context in front of the court and the entire conversations. roads hears them. what could they have said that is going to somehow change the meaning of what is in this
immigration minister is talking about djokovic staying in the country would, quote, excite anti-vaxx sentiment in the community. they rejected that as you might expect them to. but that gives us an idea of the way that the immigration minister is going to try and push this deportation forward. so he has been canceled his visa once ag once again, he s fighting it once again. he could be on the court by monday. but clearly the court understands the urgency of getting this done quickly. but they are working to their own timetable. and, paula, i have read this appeal will likely go before the same judge who reversed the visa cancellation to begin with. if it is the same judge, is there a sense that that will help his case? a lot has transpired and a lot of information, new information has come out subsequently since that initial ruling. reporter: well, the hearing we had this friday evening,
of the federal court of australia bench. so i do not think there is any basis upon which, unless of course you are an avid fan of mr djokovic, or more broadly, perhaps an anti vaxxer or perhaps have some other reason to be disgruntled after this worldwide media and the urgency with which mr djokovic s cases have been dealt with. again i say it is a fair and just result. when you think about the impact of the pandemic on australia, with over 750,000 current active omicron cases, well over 300 million globally, and untold deaths, significant disruption to everyday life and our economy, health and mental and physical well being, it is critical that a minister be able to exercise his personal powers when it is in