collusion whatsoever. there comes a time you have to say enough is enough and if anything comes up. and if anything unexpected arises that is one thing but based on all we have seen from key witnesses and following all the leads there has been no evidence of collusion, talking about the office of president of the united states and the longer this hangs out there, indicating there s something to it when we know there s nothing to it we are doing the office of the president to service in the country to service so by wrapping it up now as far as the collusion aspect we are doing the right thing. taking a closer look here is how the committee breaks down. along with 22 house until members 13 are republicans and mine are democrats. a major victory, state lawmakers praising a federal appeals court decision to uphold a new law targeting sanctuary cities and officials to back them. the rule allows police officers to ask people during routine stops whether they are in the us legally and it th
the ban does, quote, irreparable injury in the areas of employment, education, business, family relations and freedom to travel. question: is there a danger to the u.s. now that these immigrants and refugees are begin allowed to travel to the u.s., and what do you think of that federal appeals court decision not to reinstate the travel ban? well, first off, from the very outset of his campaign for president and the outset of this administration, president trump has made it clear he s going to put the safety and the security of the american people first. and the executive order that he signed suspending travel from countries that have been compromised by terror is consistent with that objective. and also, chris, it s consistent with his powers as president of the united states of america, both under the constitution and under statutory law. it s quite clear that the president has the ability to determine who has access to this country when it comes to national security. and so we beli
the ban does, quote, irreparable injury in the areas of employment, education, business, family relations and freedom to travel. question: is there a danger to the u.s. now that these immigrants and refugees are begin allowed to travel to the u.s., and what do you think of that federal appeals court decision not to reinstate the travel ban? well, first off, from the very outset of his campaign for president and the outset of this administration, president trump has made it clear he s going to put the safety and the security of the american people first. and the executive order that he signed suspending travel from countries that have been compromised by terror is consistent with that objective. and also, chris, it s consistent with his powers as president of the united states of america, both under the constitution and under statutory law. it s quite clear that the president has the ability to determine who has access to this country when it comes to national security. and so we beli
and look at the map after eight states. santorum in purple has won four. romney three. gingrich one. there s more reason for santorum to be optimistic. the culture wars have come roaring back. three huge issues have ignited the right wing the fight over birth control between the obama administration and the catholic church, the debate over funding for planned parenthood and the federal appeals court decision that california s same-sex marriage ban is unconstitutional. every day that the candidates are talking about birth control, abortion, or gay marriage santorum wins and romney loses. about that fight over the administration s decision to force catholic organizations, colleges, universities, and hospitals to pay for birth control for their employees, the question here isn t whether most catholics are with president obama. it s how many catholics voted for obama in 2008 and could vote against him because of this decision. that s something for them and the white house to consider. pl
the komen group sparked controversy last week by cutting funding to planned parenthood for breast cancer screening for low income women. a court ruling in california has knocked down the state s ban on same-sex marriages. at least for now. protesters gathered outside the courthouse in san francisco to hear the federal appeals court decision that the proposition 8 ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional. the court also said that there was no evidence that former chief u.s. judge von walker was biased and should have disclosed that he was gay before overturning proposition 8. lawyers for the group that sponsor the ban will appeal and the supreme court may make the final decision. there was a strong reaction to the court s decision striking down the anti-same-sex marriage prop 8. republican ed olson former solicitor general of the united states helped lead the challenge against proposition 8 and last night on the rachel maddow