role today. here s the firm statement. this week we began helping sandra, a full tile law student, manage the enormous volume of incoming media requests that came to a head when she was publicly disparaged for advocating for contraception coverage. we were first connected to sandra through one of her personal friends who came to us seeking our assistance. i am proud of our staff for donating their time and energy to work with sandra during this important and difficult time. the firm said anita dunn has not met or spoken to sandra fluke. sandra fluke first attempted to testify on february 16th. she was verbally assaulted by rush limbaugh on february 29th. the firm started helping her coordinate public appearances on monday, but bill o reilly still thinks the white house plan it from the start. i m going to say, and i can t
prosecutors say they plan to file a motion to try him as an adult. that will happen later this month. new charges today in the case of a nine-year-old boy accused of bringing a gun to school and accidentally shooting and seriously wounding a classmate. his mother and her boyfriend are now facing criminal firearm charges for not securing weapons in their own home. and in north carolina 37-year-old jason young facing life in prison without the possibility of parole. a jury finding him guilty of his wife, michelle s 2006 murder. you probably remember this case. she was pregnant with the couple s second child at the time. this is young s second trial. in 2009 a deadlocked jury led to a mistrial. jon: political historians see some close parallels in the g.o.p. race for president this time around. this is from a february 29th column in the new york times. not since herbert hoover has a
party out of power had such an opportunity to run against everything that troubles the american family. prices, interest rates, unemployment, taxes, or the fear for the future of their old age or the future of their children. it is now presented the republican party. the republicans however have not figured this out. this is their basic problem. well that column was published on february 29th, but it was 1980, 32 years and eight presidential election cycles ago. it was describing the republican s dilemma in trying to run against jimmy carter as he finished his first term back when conventional wisdom held ronald reagan was a sure looser. let s talk about it with tom bevin the executive editor of real clear politics .com. tom did not write that. that was written in the wall street journal. are there parallels this time around to what was going on this time, roughly, in 1979, 1980? sure. there are some obvious ones. the main one being that we have
possible iranian nuclear weapon. i m wolf blitzer and you re in the situation room. he s made a fortune stoking conservative passions while poking and proding at liberals and rush limbaugh has seen his share of controversies but this time it s different. the outrage he sparked when he called a conception advocate a slut and a prostitute has snowballed, one after the other and major advertisers are pulling their ads from his radio show and there s no sign that the uproar is dying down. lisa sylvester is working the story. what s the latest on rush limbaugh and all his advertisers? reporter: hi, wolf, we re up to at least eight advertisers walking away from the show. today on his radio show, limbaugh apologized for his choice of words but does he seem concerned about losing those advertisers? the answer is, no. thank you. reporter: the reaction was swift and fierce, advertisers are pulling spots from the rush limbaugh show including quicken loans and the latest aol wh
gas pump and casts a big shadow over obama s hopes for re-election. just a day after dismissing what he called loose talk of war with iran, he sat down with benjamin netanyahu. at the top of their agenda, talk that israel may soon attack iran s nuclear sites. jessica yellin working sources all day. take us inside three hours of talks and a working lunch later, what do we know? reporter: we re told the prime minister and the president within their three hours had 30 minutes when they were one-on-one. none of us will know really what they talked about when they were alone together. but the most pressing question, did they discuss red lines, and we are told by u.s. and israeli officials that that was not what the the two leaders sat down to talk about. that this was essentially a meeting to make clear to each leader where they stand on these fundamental issues of what it would take to press each other for an attack, but they did not ask each other fundamentally for the go-ahea