requested. we can play the full video, a shortened version of the full video, if i get a clearexactly the jury is looking for. or 191, the half speed version of the short video. did that make sense? i believe so. we do not want the half speed version. okay. it is the video itself from what point? from where the camera gets picked up, that s what i m understanding. correct. that s correct. all right. when the camera so can the state find that point on the video. and then the high the high contrast version, i understand, is the shortened version that is in high contrast, and then i want to make sure that you all understand the 911 call made by greg mcmichael on february 23rd, the entire call is about five minutes. the first part of it was played
back in 2019 and use that knowledge to somehow suggest that they were justified in trying to detain or arrest him on february 23rd. i thought her arguments were brilliant. i thought they were powerful, and i think they landed with this jury. and of course it s important to note that this trial and these jury deliberations come on the heels of the kyle rittenhouse verdict, which acquitted him on all charges. this georgia trial also deals with vigilante justice. how do you expect this trial to end? i think and i m hoping that there s a very different outcome, but, you know, as you pointed out, we just saw in the kyle rittenhouse case, a case that also was about self-defense, that the prosecution wasn t able to convince the jurors beyond a reasonable doubt with respect to its case. these cases of self-defense are challenging because essentially you have vigilantes like the mcmichaels, like kyle rittenhouse, that go into a situation. they provoke the aggression that
one of the other things they re doing, in addition to the physical descriptions there, they are saying things like he was, quote, running away instead of facing the consequences, unquote. and that he was, quote, making terrible, unexpected, illogical choices, unquote. in essence, trying to blame him for what happened. what did you think of that? on february 23rd, the day that ahmaud was killed, ahmaud had no clue that he was under attack. ahmaud knew that he had not committed a crime, so it was no it was no reason for him to be under an attack like that. my son died as a very confused, scared individual. the defense also seems to be going to great ends in physical descriptions of your son. how do you think they are, subtly or not so subtly, trying to make race an issue? i do think anything they
do you believe for a minute he was talking softly to ahmaud arbery? what s going on, what are you doing? please stop running. do you really believe that for one minute? i m going to ask you another question. do you think this travis mcmichael who took the stand was the same travis mcmichael from february 23rd? you think the they re the same person? or do you think this is trial preparation? what tone of voice do we have being used by the mcmichaels? hello. 911. what s the address of your emergency? i m out here at satilla shores. there s a black male running down the street. where at satilla shores? i don t know what street we re on. stop right there! stop! sir, hello?
was talking softly to ahmaud arbery. what s going on, what are you doing? please stop for me. do you really believe that for one minute? i m going to ask you another question. do you think this travis mcmichael who took the stand was the same travis mcmichael from february 23rd? you think they re the same person? or do you think this is trial preparation? what tone of voice do we have being used by the mcmichaels? hello! 911, what s the address of your emergency? uh, i m out here. there s a black male running down the street where at scitila shores? i don t know what street we re on. stop! sir? hello?