to the time of the trial, she improved. i mean, to the point where she wasn t having hallucinations. on september 22nd, 2001, just three months and two days after the murders, yates was deemed competent to stand trial. the prosecution planned to argue that andrea s motive was to get back at her husband for perceived wrongs, like living in a bus, home schooling, and the inconveniences of a simpler life style. the defense knew better than to bring rusty in to the equation. had i gone after rusty, as people wanted me to do, then the jury could be told by the prosecutor in summation or at the end, she, in effect, by killing the kids, she was getting back at rusty for the various things that he had done and would give her an ulterior motive. the trial began in february 2002.
style. the defense knew better than to bring rusty in to the equation. had i gone after rusty, as people wanted me to do, then the jury could be told by the prosecutor in summation or at the end, she, in effect, by killing the kids, she was getting back at rusty for the various things that he had done and would give her an ulterior motive. the trial began in february 2002. both sides brought in pre-eminent psychiatrists to testify. dr. phillip resnick led for the defense. his counterpart was dr. park
mountain state will begin legal sales of marijuana for recreational use. legal pot sales set to combin in washington state later this year. in minneapolis, fires engulfed apartments. no word on the cause. there are reports of an explosion before the flames broke out. i am leland viter, now back to the o rielly factor. way back in february 2002, james woods spoke to us with a flight he took from boston to l.a. one month before the terror attacks. woods was in first-class with four men of middle eastern decent. he told the fbi it was suspicious and they interviewed him after the 9/11 attack. the story is unbelievable. roll the tape. now, 9/11 happen and you are
the prosecution planned to argue that andrea s motive was to get back at her husband for perceived wrongs, like living in a bus, home schooling, and the inconveniences of a simpler life style. the defense knew better than to bring rusty in to the equation. had i gone after rusty, as people wanted me to do, then the jury could be told by the prosecutor in summation or at the end, she, in effect, by killing the kids, she was getting back at rusty for the various things that he had done and would give her an ulterior motive. the trial began in february 2002. both sides brought in pre-eminent psychiatrists to testify. dr. phillip resnick led for the defense. his counterpart was dr. park
the prosecution planned to argue that andrea s motive was to get back at her husband for perceived wrongs like living in a bus, homeschooling and the inconveniences of a simpler life style. the defense knew better than to bring rusty into the equation. had i gone after rusty, as people wanted me to do, then the jury could be told by the prosecutor in summation or at the end, she, in effect, by killing the kids, she was getting back at rusty for the various things that he had done and would give her an ulterior motive. the trial began in february 2002. both sides brought in pre-eminent psychiatrists to testify. dr. phillip resnick led for the defense. hi counter part was dr. park dietz, renowned for testifying