him they ll make them like deposed him after he was fired, by may 9th they still didn t have anything and that s what michael horowitz told us in the report. but they didn t care appeared because they cut the going we got the mueller administration. tucker: one after another. why lift a finger to help people s safety, security, peace and prosperity? not an option. devin nunes, let s ask you. when you go to the comments, particularly barr and durham. hard-hitting, when you couple it with the previous statements, i don t believe any attorney general would be saying that unless he knew dead on accurate is perfect that they ve got it. they ve got it all. the difference here with the horwitz report which the means to report is loving that from the information we ve seen, they
exaggerated the one primary source, statements, multiple selections of the reporting. this primary sub source felt that the tenor of his p29 s report is far more conclusive than justified. and the sub source, primary, only sub source for the most part, stated he or she never expected steele to put the primary sub stores statement in reports or present them as facts. the primary sub source explained that his or her information came from word-of-mouth and hearsay. here we go again. conversations that he or she had with friends over beers in a bar and some of the information such as allegations about trump central activities, two hookers, moscow, those are statements he or she heard in a bar made in jest. i m not making that up. the primary sub source said that
bought and paid for he said it, don t know if any of it is true. sub source saying i didn t expect this guide use it in the report, did not know if it s true. they never verified it. comey signed his name three times to it. also hilary paid for it, that should be front and center, dead on, judge, look at this bit we know without the dirty dossier, they don t get the fisa warrant, do they, lindsey graham? i want every democrat and republican the come together on, that it s wrong for the fbi to not tell a court exculpatory information, that once the fbi was told by the primary sub source that all the stuff i gave steele, i never meant it to go in a report. it s a bunch of hearsay, gossip, bar talk. it s not reliable. i hope every american would agree that the proper thing for the fbi to do is to inform the court of exculpatory information. the wrong thing to do is to lie
considered reliable as a source agent? yes. what s your assessment of that dossier? as described, it was a series of reports from a credible person with a reliable track record and a known source network in russia. something to be taken seriously. didn t mean it was all true, but it was to be taken seriously. and its core assertion was corroborated by other intelligence officers. the core intelligent being the russians having a campaign going on to interfere in the election. tucker: that was then and remains today a total live. one of many from mr. super patriot jim comey. this is important. we haven t discussed the glaring omissions. that s a big deal too. on multiple occasions, comey s fdi exculpatory information from
in the dossier is a bunch of b.s., that s when it became the criminal they told the court that they were truthful and credible. at that point in time, the people at the department of justice in the fbi, they trample on the constitutional rights of carter page and continue the surveillance, it became as if j. edgar hoover came from the grave and took over the investigation generate 2,017th. it when did they know and when did they know it, and i want to know when the vindman knew about th this. sean: i want to know all about this too. a bulk of information to obtain the fisa warrant is the dirty