pinkalmo lovemo it ielus .nk mo ot t fis tovee col i el itus i a tisoloncontrovers. i ionntve. bh sid of t ticasperum - are goih s t cry. s a m cae m re g i s this a s ts tid toy myaughr wn t school wh heryypighder- wma n shirand scol herpir-hu tiraylods. she think mhumy lks likes a tlo. cln w h hshere thiv m u lks les clw h tv s elati herock sr da s we h ela iiserotock rllry rock da starwe. h sou aot mared t rll oc kider-man? eterar aar t pr. ere ians i mpress erynd p war.s toopyim. i i sreo you aynd not owageto s myodluyutraged, b ige noeve an issue.ra d, a not outrage nove iue. i ot outraotge ot raal wh thi excotptio oitras aal j. cwth excio s ca alo jw eris nhicanglo y can u en y arelone ardo mng y u yrene do
wanted to put forth $73 billion worth of cuts but then they pulled it away and they stuck at the $100 billion. now, that may have changed as of late last night. we re still debating over some of the merits of this. we need to move on and get to the important issues of jobs and certainly the budget that looms ahead for 2012. sorting through it for us. we hear the newspapers reporting on riders for planned parenthood and pbs, is a significant part of the disagreement? is it a significant part? is that what you re yelling about in the republican caucus rooms and democrat caucus rooms or is it pr, just more about the money? obviously, money is the issue at hand. i think that s a way to posture whether or not you re willing to give in to the billions in dollars in cuts we actually need. the riders are blocking progress for this country. it would be great to set them aside and let s debate those on those merits.
at. s ar it sot t yon etub ftyiendest of . ergy s t srces if fndtyoufly. gy so m s notes sehat asu. soot s polit that anydyill beliencrees oil li at oducnyonl lire o o uc creasur o depeencen oi bt: eaet sget out tovpece oi y, t pr iden wen t bo thislant sttov tod. trenen t isntod mess. headarted inpain thwhit hou s sss th ad te increain obsth initou arica. sh it w ea pr. isss fornthe a ca whit wousee wen p tss aorlace thate w it snishompa.se enther tare wdmilce ind at w rbin scompshies pa the ere wil nd u. tha saihy seninmp ts athe u.ssaghaai yen trobl? don aag proems lon it ibl? creingobs f onro onerics. at i theit n imber oneregs fprioty. breic secdly, ihe ner tne io . pres ent ener preicy.ecy, geing tttacd fro aest nuerer p y. ofiffent s esgegow.acro a uverydy i concnedoffe s abou it. beca.e th pce ry i gancd is ou t. ing . cath p evennhe whi ouse tgays are ry ensig ve to t sen hi issee. t ey r tel nge pplesiouto t ow is wh? rel p evee tingtep
bin laden bump gives the president a bump in the polls it pr provokes people like mark mill, myself and others to fantasize about all the things a president riding a bump like that might do in our strange fantasy brains. the fact of the matter is that history suggests that these presidents, whether it is this one or anyone before him will do absolutely nothing more that perpetuate the status quo of lefty righty politics, is there anything that could be done outside the white house that could pressure this president to actually do something beyond the traditional bump and roll back to the status quo?