out and attacked the privileges committee, using very strong language. if we park for one moment, the rights and the wrongs and just leave with the impression that isn t this going to undermine trust in the political institutions? dozen that have echoes of what we have witnessed over in the us? doesn t that? i witnessed over in the us? doesn t that? ., ., , ., witnessed over in the us? doesn t that? ., ., , a, , that? i want to understand your question. that? i want to understand your question, exactly, that? i want to understand your question, exactly, are - that? i want to understand your question, exactly, are you - question, exactly, are you suggesting that his criticism of the privileges committee, in of itself, undermines confidence in political institutions? i undermines confidence in political institutions? institutions? i was referring more to the language. institutions? i was referring more to the language, kangaroo - institutions? i was referring mor
would although his westminster one, i would say, it is. it although his westminster one, i would say, it is. although his westminster one, i would say, it is. it is interesting. let s pick would say, it is. it is interesting. let s pick it would say, it is. it is interesting. let s pick it up would say, it is. it is interesting. let s pick it up with would say, it is. it is interesting. let s pick it up with fattah - would say, it is. it is interesting. let s pick it up with fattah john i let s pick it up with fattahjohn curtis. read the last line of the johnson statement. it is very sad to be leaving parliament, at least for now. what do you interpret that to mean? what do you think i boris johnson s future, or otherwise? t johnson s future, or otherwise? i think it is all the peace of somebody who is otherwise unsurprisingly deeply reluctant to accept thejudgment of unsurprisingly deeply reluctant to accept the judgment of his peers and perhaps therefore is hoping that may