opinion, it seems, based i haven t read all the statements about what the constitution allows or what it prescribes with regard to impeachment. so they become kind of partisan actors in this fight. and we know how political impeachment has been historically. there s no agreement about what is the basis of impeachment over the years. that s true, but think about in terms of a trial. fact witnesses who tell you what they saw firsthand. and then experts tell you what it means. if it was a medical report and someone shows you the actual words you need a medical expert to say, what is the diagnosis going to be? i look at this as a diagnosis and as a sense of, remember, talking about history and the founding fathers of the constitution. they were fighting against a king. they did not want to have a monarch. what is a monarch? somebody who could indefinitely hold office and no one can do anything it. and they abused power to stay in office. we re talking about somebody who has been accu
that s what people are investigating, not convicting yet but investigating. that s absolutely false. well, i m not sure how it could be false if i cited a section of the founding fathers of the constitution but i ll finish my point because you demanded the same in return. you ll get the also a point. the idea of the whistle-blower act and why we have the protection and anonymity. you re correct in saying it is imperative for people to investigate the allegations of a whistle-blower complaint. and if the underlying substantial that s being investigated to shoot the messenger is antithetical to what we stand for. it doesn t mean the allegations alone will lead to a conviction. it does mean if you had the allegations there, don t focus on the actual messenger, focus on the investigation. jenna, where do you take issue? with bribery. here you don t have a quid pro quo or anything remotely related
that s what is the there that people are investigating, not convicting yet, but investigating about that particular aspect. but you re absolutely right here. that is absolutely false. excuse me. you re absolutely i m not sure how it can be false if i cited a section of the founding fathers of the constitution. but i ll finish my point because you demanded the same in return. you ll get the last one, jenna. go ahead. the idea of the whistle-blower act and why we have the protection and anonymity there. you re absolutely correct in saying it is imperative for people to investigate the allegations of a whistle-blower complaint. and if the underlying substance is being investigated, to shoot the messager is really antithetical to what we stand for. it doesn t mean the allegations alone will lead to a conviction. it does mean if you had the allegations there, don t focus on the actual messenger, focus on the investigation. jenna, where do you take issue? yeah so, with bribery. h
but in my mind she s guilty as hell. in the mind of the founding fathers who wrote our beautiful, beautiful constitution, bernie. waste of taxpayer money to drag this disgrace out for six months or whatever the hell it is. if you hate the founding fathers of the constitution, that s your business, sir. i do not. all right. so you re apologist for killers and murderers. i do not apologize for supporting the constitution or the founding fathers, bernie. again, you are free to hate them. who are you impersonating right now, andy? i don t really know. andy just doesn t like to wipe his butt with the old constitution. that s all i m saying. by the way, she s not even that hot. i don t know about that. i agree. crazy makes her hot. no, i agree. can we tweet this with the seriousness it deserves? i doubt it. i was just asking. no, i know. i was answering. dana, you said of arias artwork that bill should try to sell it on ebay.
but in my mind she s guilty as hell. in the mind of the founding fathers who wrote our beautiful, beautiful constitution, bernie. waste of taxpayer money to drag this disgrace out for six months or whatever the hell it is. if you hate the founding fathers of the constitution, that s your business, sir. i do not. all right. so you re apologist for killers and murderers. i do not apologize for supporting the constitution or the founding fathers, bernie. again, you are free to hate them. who are you impersonating right now, andy? i don t really know. andy just doesn t like to wipe his butt with the old constitution. that s all i m saying. by the way, she s not even that hot. i don t know about that. i agree. crazy makes her hot. no, i agree. can we tweet this with the seriousness it deserves? i doubt it. i was just asking. no, i know. i was answering. dana, you said of arias artwork that bill should try to sell it on ebay.