the house democrats want to move quickly and they want to have a full vote on articles of impeachment by thanksgiving and that s less than two months from now, but as you know the white house will stonewall in terms of dealing with subpoenas and getting documents. can they do it? can they have a full vote by then? i think they will try to do so and the president will try to stonewall, but here s the difference before. they ll hopefully learn a lesson that the stonewalling is a delay tactic and if congress is prepared to go for it and that fast track system they have to bring the american people along with them as an eye going to the senate, but right now is the straw that broke the camel s back. this was an abuse of power. it wasn t about the idea and the semantics about trying to do the paper trail and who was more credible, james comey or somebody else? who should we believe. if it comes down to you ve already had the fast track what the president giving you what he wants and an or
getting a training module, what they call them and in the training module the man is in power. the woman a subordinate and they re at a cocktail party. title 7 was never meant to be an etiquette guide. doesn t govern social behavior. people mistakenly think i can t hang out with a woman. cancel the christmas party. that s not what the law was meant to prohibit. men and women should be able to work equally in the workplace. it enderses more unequal and unplerchlt. some of the ways, byzantine, the way it s approach pd really meant to change the landscape. and it is a many of the things we ve heard about recently did not take place even within the construct of a workplace. but it is a power relationship and we don t how do we address it? is this going to be addressed legally or cullturaly? i think the law has catching up to do, because we re seeing now a fast-track system, but happening in, i guess what you d