in taiwan is in effect preparing it, arming it, and supporting it so that china will be deterred from anything that is rash or reckless. ayesha: earlier this year that same missile test was cancelled because of tension with russia. senator cotton asked lloyd austin how long the administration plans to allow china and russia to dictate our missile test schedule and mike rogers, a top republican on the house armed services committee talked this weak-kneed pearl clutching attempts that will invite more aggression from our adversaries. here is senator kennedy. i think this administration believes they can deter hard men and they are all men, like putin
ranch and where the boundaries are. the blm says, look, we are not considering expanding our land rights. they say expanding which has ranchers saying that s the key word. they are claiming they own it all though we have been farming it, ranch it. it doesn t belong to the feds. absolutely. you ve got the point exactly. again, they own the land. they have the deed to it. it was given to them. the bureau of land management is trying to argue the state of texas had no right to give deed to the ranchers. i beg to differ with this. this is a state issue. again, that is bureaucratic entity trying to supplant state sovereignty. the sate has sovereignty and the president s bureau of land management wants to ignore this. for people who are concerned about it, i want to leave them with this. the oklahoma blm issued a statement on this. i want to put people at ease. they said, the need for the
ranch and where the boundaries are. the blm says, look, we are not considering expanding our land rights. they say expanding which has ranchers saying that s the key word. they are claiming they own it all though we have been farming it, ranch it. it doesn t belong to the feds. absolutely. you ve got the point exactly. again, they own the land. they have the deed to it. it was given to them. the bureau of land management is trying to argue the state of texas had no right to give deed to the ranchers. i beg to differ with this. this is a state issue. again, that is bureaucratic entity trying to supplant state sovereignty. the sate has sovereignty and the president s bureau of land management wants to ignore this. for people who are concerned about it, i want to leave them with this. the oklahoma blm issued a statement on this. i want to put people at ease. they said, the need for the
chemical weapons and stockpiles. what s the question? i don t think the solution lies in syria, i felt this for two and a half years, the issue is not syria. the issue is iran and it s nuclear weapons program. we go into iran and end that program, and you think that syria s going to fall like a house of cards? i think if the ayatollahs in tehran were not supporting the assad regime he would have collapsed two years ago. the threat to peace and security in the region is iran s support for international terrorism, financing it, arming it, equipping it, and their nuclear weapons program. syria is a tragedy, but is a strategic side show. where is iran getting the money. i realize we have waivers, where are they getting the money to finance assad and to finance terrorism at this point? they have built up reserves over the years, recognizing that sanctions may hit them at some point, when oil prices were high, they weren t spending all that money, they were banking it, they re pr
chemical weapons and stockpiles. what s the question? i don t think the solution lies in syria, i felt this for two and a half years, the issue is not syria. the issue is iran and it s nuclear weapons program. we go into iran and end that program, and you think that syria s going to fall like a house of cards? i think if the ayatollahs in tehran were not supporting the assad regime he would have collapsed two years ago. the threat to peace and security in the region is iran s support for international terrorism, financing it, arming it, equipping it, and their nuclear weapons program. syria is a tragedy, but is a strategic side show. where is iran getting the money. i realize we have waivers, where are they getting the money to finance assad and to finance terrorism at this point? they have built up reserves over the years, recognizing that sanctions may hit them at some point, when oil prices were high, they weren t spending all that money, they were banking it, they re pr