of sight since trump s charges were filed, but that ends today. an event set to begin any minute now is focused on violent crime, but the real question is will he talk about trump or special counsel jack smith? and a group of kids suing the state of montana over their right to a healthy, livable climate. is it meant to make a political point or is it a real case based in the law? but we start with brand new nbc reporting from inside trump world that the former president is bracing now for even more indictments. a source in contact with donald trump also says he knows that means a long and uncertain period of legal battles, even as he s telling allies he can t believe the florida case has gotten this far. but while trump seems to know that the level of legal peril is shifting, he s sticking to a tried and true political strategy, attacking his enemies while insisting he did nothing
now it could bring the band back together one last time. a case of musical time travel, if you will. ai has the ability to understand what john s voice sounds like, for tracks to be de-mixed and assembled in better quality. in the beatles era, that technology was unthinkable. there s a good side to, and then a scary side. and we just have to see where that leads! this is so great. reporter: as ringo starr told me a decade ago. look at the state of the art. this is a tape player and to try and get a good sound, we have plugged it into a mono radio. would you like to still be playing with the band? oh, yeah, any day. it was the best band don t let me down now, he can in a way. ai was used to enhance the music in this documentary, with unseen outtakes of the last recording session. but more controversially, ai
the rule of law. any questions about this matter will have to be answered by their filings in court. mr. attorney general, experts in extremism had feared there would be unrest in miami this week. some people are saying it s because the justice department has been so assertive in prosecuting rioters on january 6th that we have not seen a repeat of that violence. do you agree with that assessment? all i can say is we live in a democracy. these kind of matters are adjudicated through the judicial system. the justice department will be vigilant to ensure that there are no threats of violence or actual violence. can you give the american public a very clear sense of what exactly your role was in the indictment process, just so people can understand what that role is? and then secondarily, given the historic and extraordinary nature of the case, explain to people, if you would, why this
trump, who have been talking to us privately is that he really, really had a zillion red flags. you know, you re speeding. you re speeding. now it s reckless driving. now it s not reckless driving. now it s nearly manslaughter. you know, he had a million places where he could have chosen another route, and republicans who we are talking to privately who are actually rooting for donald trump to essentially go down in this case warned me in the summer of 2022 that this was the most grave legal danger for donald trump. you know, fani willis s racketeering case is pretty striking, but we don t know all the details of what will be laid out. but this one is where one where people have been court martialed, sent to jail, lost their law license. these are the acts of a person these acts as alleged by jack smith are not ones that you just walk away blithely from
the case. i want to play a little bit of that for you. this is something that s really important to me, and i think it s the right thing to do. it s my future that i want to protect, and you know, all the kids futures of montana. regardless of political beliefs, and regardless of whether they may fall on the political spectrum, montanans understand the desire to protect montana. you know, at 5 to 22, you can also make the argument, paul, that these are the ones who are going to be facing the long-term effects of climate change, long after we re gone. does that have any bearing on the case? i think it certainly has a symbolic barrier. the trial judge will know that these people, these young folks will be effective way more than others. there was a federal case like this a couple of years ago, but chief justice john roberts shut that down so, chris, now environmental lawyers are looking to the states for relief that doesn t seem to be coming from congress, from the white house,