increased, including advancing the unprecedented legislation to legalize settler outposts that the prime minister himself reportedly warned could expose israel to action at the security council and even international prosecution, before deciding to support it. in the end, we could not in good conscience protect the most extreme elements of the settler movement as it tries to destroy the two-state solution. we could not in good conscience turn a blind eye to palestinian actions that fan hatred and violence. it is not in u.s. interests to help anyone on either side create a unitary state, and we may not be able to stop them, but we cannot be expected to defend them. and it is certainly not the role of any country to vote against its own policies. that is why we decided not to
increased including advancing the unprecedented legislation to legalize settler outpostthat the prime minister himself reportedly warned could expose action, before deciding to support it. in the end, we could not in good conscious protect the most extreme elements of the settler movement as it tries to destroy the two-state solution. we could not in good conscious turn a blind eye to palestinian actions that fan hatred and violence. it is not in u.s. interest to help anyone on either side, create a unitary state and we may not be able to stop them, but we cannot be expected to defend them. and it is certainly not the role of any country to vote against its own policies. that is why we decided not to block the un resolution that
unprecedented legislation to legalize settler outposts that the prime minister himself warnled could expose israel to action at the security council and even international prosecution. before deciding to support it. in the end we could not in good conscience protect the most extreme elements of the settler movement as it tries to destroy the two-state solution. we could not turn a blind eye to palestinian actions that fan hatred and violence. it is not in u.s. interests to help anyone on either side create a unitary state. we may not be able to stop them. but we cannot be exen expected to defend them. it is certainly not the role of any country to vote against its own policies. that s why we decided not to block the u.n. resolution that
in the end, we could not in good conscience protect the most extreme elements of the settler movement as it tries to destroy the two-state solution. we could not in good conscience turn a blind eye to palestinian actions that fan hatred and violence. it is not in u.s. interests to help anyone on either side create a unitary state, and we may not be able to stop them, but we cannot be expected to defend them. joining us live from jude m jerusalem, what it s your reaction to secretary of state kerry s argument about the necessary way forward, in his view y. well, secretary kerry s speech is not unlike the obama policy. it s divorced from reality, but with good intentions. it s left the middle east in flames, a genocide in syria. iraq falling apart.