they have spoken repeatedly with tony, with the guy that did pay paul manafort this money while paul manafort lied to them about it over and over and over again and in the course of figuring out the truth of that payment, mueller s office also uncovered a little bit of a kickback scheme. not particularly sophisticated system by which these guys were basically skimming off a bunch of money people donated at the super pac and keeping it for themselves. they discovered the truth of the payment and discover when getting to the truth of the payment there was a little scheme here, there was a kickback scheme and cash moving necessarily where it shouldn t have gone but hard to tell this stuff directly from court filings in the manafort case because of the redactions and written documents and in the transcripts but through basically doing the math and pairing and reading closely all these documents and reporting it all and calling people and tracking them down, christina appears to have basica
long-standing work colleague of manafort dating back decades and reportedly god father to one of paul manafort s daughters. what cnbc is reporting is that when manafort in june 2017 asked this protrump super pac this is after the campaign, campaign has been over and manafort goes to this pro trump super pac and wants $125,000. we now can tell basically the answer was yes but. yes, paul, you can have the money but you re not going to get it from me exactly. instead, you should get it to the other place, the other entity, this generic named fuzzy corporate entity which according to cnbc was secretly owned and controlled by a famous tony and
not a crime as far as i can tell. why manafort would go to such lengths to lie when that had such dire consequences for him is absolutely inexplicable. that s one. consequence two, despite manafort lying about it over and over again, the prosecutors know the truth from court filings, it appears part of the reason mueller s office knows what really happened here is because they have spoken repeatedly with tony, with the guy that did pay paul manafort this money while paul manafort lied to them about it over and over and over again and in the course of figuring out the truth of that payment, mueller s office also uncovered a little bit of a kickback scheme. not particularly sophisticated system by which these guys were basically skimming off a bunch of money people donated at the super pac and keeping it for
wants $125,000. we now can tell bay sye sic bas answer was yes but. yes, paul, you can have the money but you re not going to get it from me exactly. instead, you should get it to the other place, the other entity, this generic named fuzzy corporate entity which according to cnbc was secretly owned and controlled by a famous tony and in fact that little corporate fuzzy entity gave manafort the money. now, do you care about paul manafort getting some of his legal fees paid for? do you care? no. not not on strakt none of us care about this but there is three sort of hair raising
manafort lying about it over and over again, the prosecutors know the truth from court filings, it appears part of the reason mueller s office knows what really happened here is because they have spoken repeatedly with tony, with the guy that did pay paul manafort this money while paul manafort lied to them about it over and over and over again and in the course of figuring out the truth of that payment, mueller s office also uncovered a little bit of a kickback scheme. not particularly sophisticated system by which these guys were basically skimming off a bunch of money people donated at the super pac and keeping it for themselves. they discovered the truth of the payment and discover when getting to the truth of the payment there was a little scheme here, there was a kickback scheme and cash moving necessarily where it shouldn t have gone but hard to tell this stuff directly from court filings in the manafort case because of the redactions and