Love bomb your bath with Lush bangkokpost.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bangkokpost.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Try these super easy DIY witch costumes ideas for Halloween this year, which are perfect for simple last-minute Halloween costumes for adults and kids.
stage. but it has nothing to do with his own polling performance. his polling performance by cnn s own rules means he shouldn t be there. he literally did not make the cut. cnn nevertheless is pretending on air that he did make the cut. and they re breaking their own rules apparently in order to let him into this debate. and it turns out they will admit that if you press them on the matter no matter what their anchors are saying on the air. cnn s full statement explaining why they are letting rand paul break their rules and be in the debate that he has not qualified for is this. in the light of new polling released this morning and in the spirit of being as inclusive as possible, cnn has decided to include senator rand paul in the prime time debate. again, the new polling released yesterday morning does not qualify rand paul for the debate. but cnn has decided to let him in because, eh, they felt a spirit of inclusiveness. the spirit of inclusiveness apparently did not extend its fai
in because, eh, they felt a spirit of inclusiveness. the spirit of inclusiveness apparently did not extend its fairy wand over george pataki or rick santorum or lindsey graham or mike huckabee. they don t get vaulted to the main table even though they haven t qualified for it. the spirit of inclusiveness at cnn only cheats for rand paul. but why? why? why are they doing this? why are they breaking the rules to let rand paul do something he hasn t qualified for? you have to remember that the last time cnn had a republican debate you might remember they also bent their rules in order to let carly fiorina onto the main stage. in that case, though, cnn at least had the good sense to announce that they were changing their rules well in advance of actually declaring who was in the debate, and they didn t just change the rules specifically because the spirit of something told them to for carly fiorina. they at least changed the overall criteria for how to get into that debate in a way that ha
in because, eh, they felt a spirit of inclusiveness. the spirit of inclusiveness apparently did not extend its fairy wand over george pataki or rick santorum or lindsey graham or mike huckabee. they don t get vaulted to the main table even though they haven t qualified for it. the spirit of inclusiveness at cnn only cheats for rand paul. but why? why? why are they doing this? why are they breaking the rules to let rand paul do something he hasn t qualified for? you have to remember that the last time cnn had a republican debate you might remember they also bent their rules in order to let carly fiorina onto the main stage. in that case, though, cnn at least had the good sense to announce that they were changing their rules well in advance of actually declaring who was in the debate, and they didn t just change the rules specifically because the spirit of something told them to for carly fiorina. they at least changed the overall criteria for how to get into that debate in a way that ha