before we have another president. and i would argue that s fair to the republican candidate, give them time to do that. but there are issues of fairne fairness. not coming out in the middle of election season is a matter of fundamental fairness. not coming out so close to 2020 is monumental fairness. but when you re dealing with a bunch of people who were lying personally, lying after they ve agreed to cooperate kwu, i have some empathy for mueller in terms tft amount of time this is taking. there is one thing that has happened that i think has not gotten a lot of attention in the last couple weeks maybe it was still this week, everything blends together. but the significant part of paul manafort, maybe it s helpful to donald trump if paul manafort isn t cooperating. not just not cooperating but funneling information to donald
that mr. o reilly could be dismissed if the company was made aware of other allegations or additional information was on ta obtained in a company investigation. they ve made steps to transform fox news. this is a question i m asking you, did the company essentiall? when a company takes the contract knowing the bad history. no other way to characterize this, of bill o reilly, and extends the contact, is that legal? you used the magic word, condone. under new york law, an employer could be liable for the harassment of its employee if it condoned that harassment. now, what does that mean? well, new york law tells us that inaction in the face of knowledge that this employee is harassing someone counts. that means they knew about it and did nothing. that s the way the law is virtually all over the country. but on the other hand, in fairne fairness, on one hand, you have
fairne fairness. i don t think anyone is arguing that raising taxes on a small percentage of the population will fix the problems. then why won t it pass? i think people want a bigger answer. chuck todd, what is the white house strategy behind the buffett rule? the buffett rule is about two things. i don t think you d see this big push by the white house if mitt romney weren t the nominee. they want to highlight romney s personal wealth, personal income, and all of those things as a way of trying to create the disconnect that we have already seen in some polling that he has with working class voters and working class voters i think are a big swing vote in certain states like ohio. the second part of this push on the buffett rule is, you have an incumbent a sitting president running for re-election who is running on raising taxes. the bush tax cuts expire at the end of the year. he has said it.