classified material is or isn't a crime. if it is they should be prosecuted. they would challenge it or constitutional grounds. they might or might not win. we can't allow the government to pick or choose. going back to your opening statement here today which you'll be surprised that i agree with much of. i want the government out of deciding what the churches can say. you don't want the government to say new york times, that's good. if it's a radical newspaper like so and so, maybe it's not. we don't want to give the government any discretion as to which media to go after. the law has to be changed to make it absolutely clear what that red line is and when you cross it [ applause ] >> i would think there is a huge difference between a paper publishing the existence of a program and publishing operational details, names of agents, locations that could actually endanger somebody's life. that would have to be factored in, would it not? >> that should be part of the law. believe it or not, it's not today part of the law and it's
Related Keywords
Government , Isn Ta Crime , Opening Statement , Grounds , Churches , Newspaper , Of , New York Times , Applause , Law , Difference , Media , Red Line , Paper , Discretion , Somebody , Program , Life , Part , Names , Agents , Locations , Existence , Details , Factored In ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.