translator: it is proposed that the united nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of september 11 so that in the future expressing views about it so that to ensure that the different views about it are not banned from discussion in the future. the white house spokesman robert gibbs said that president obama found those comments outrageous and offensive. especially since they were said very close to ground zero. and then there was a statement from the u.s. mission to the united nations saying that calling this vile conspiracy theorys, antisematimitic slurs. you have to have a double mind here. there may be some movement toward talking with iran, even in the midst of all of these comments. it is interesting. and you hear some other comments like former new york mayor
government had a hand in 9/11. frankly, sir, how could you say such an insane and nutty thing? when you address your own president the same way? would they ever allow you to? in terms of that remark, those remarks? you did not probably read the full remark. what evidence do you have that the up is responsible for 9/11? you are not allowing me to respond. and you insult me, as well. do you believe the government had a hand in 9/11? i did not say, give an opinion of my own, i actually suggested that a fact finding group and mission be formed to look into the truth. do you want to pursue a nuclear bomb? i have said on numerous occasions that we do not want an
fact-finding group and mission be formed to delve into the truth. do you think that the entire world has to accept what the u.s. government tells them? or do you think that perhaps a fact-finding mission is necessary to tell the world reporter: osama bin laden has taken credit, al-qaeda officials have taken credit. it seems very clear. translator: that s fine, but the fact-finding mission can shed light on who the perpetrators were. who is alibi, who is where does it exist, who was it backed by and supported. all these should come to light. where do they receive their financial resources? we like to shed light on these. how come is it that they were able to infiltrate the security layers and intelligence layers of the united states?
and also comedian stephen colbert testimony before congress. today, senior correspondent eric shawn sat down with iranian president ahmadinejad in a combative interview. you can see the interview on foxnews.com/specialreport. he backed up, the iranian president, the assertion that the u.s. might have been behind the 9/11 attacks saying there should be a fact-finding group. do you trust everything the u.s. government tells you? the president called that offensive and hateful. what about this back-and-forth? the panel is back. charles? the president says the right words. it s offensive, hateful. the u.n./u.s. delegation yesterday called him delusional. last year, at the u.n., when obama revealed the facility that iran had been hiding he said it s not explainable by any peaceful intent, which means they are building a bomb. president of iran denies it over and over again, so he s a liar. so here is my question.
act the way iran conducted the operations fighting the terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in the iranian operation, no innocent person was harmed. it is proposed that the united nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of september 11 so that in the future, expressing views about it so that to ensure that the dif rent views about it are not banned from discussion in the future. i wish to announce here that next year, the islamic republic of iran will host a conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. i invite officials, scholars, thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend.