any contact with russians during the campaign, and is apparently only coming forward with this story after michael caputo, one of the communications staff on the campaign, was confronted with tweets about the meeting, while he was being questioned by mueller s investigators. important to clarify that what we re hearing this story that the approach was from an fbi informant is simply stone self-serving version of the facts. f greenberg did provide information to the fbi, that concluded in 2012 so this is an effort by stone to tag on to the other allegations that the fbi manufactured this investigation. mueller s investigation signifies that this is a very serious matter, and something that we don t talk about often enough is that mueller is looking at russian efforts to influence this campaign.
response. whatever the recollections about this, stone did nothing about it, came to the conclusion according to the post it was a waste of time. he and greenberg came to the conclusion it was a waste of time. i can t imagine anything got back to the then presidential candidate. if it was a waste of time. joyce advance, welcome to you. roger stone did not disclose this meeting to congressional investigators but is telling the washington post he believes the fbi was setting him up because the man he met with claims to have been also an fbi informa informant. the post is reporting zero evidence to verify the claims. who is more in the wrong here? it s very interesting, alex, what we re hearing right now is roger stone s version of the facts and it s important to note that stone lied to congressional investigators, didn t disclose this meeting, vehemently denied