because there s no reason for him to do it, no reason whatsoever. now, you ve heard a lot of testimony about these financial crimes, misdeeds, and he told you he did it, he told you he did it to support a very expensive drug habit, and none of that s an excuse, but he is an addict, and addiction is real, and addicts lie, addicts cheat, addicts steal to keep getting their drug. the evidence was permitted in this for you to hear solely to consider, did he murder his wife and son because he had this storm acoming, he was going to be exposed? is that why he murdered that s what they say. that s why you are allowed to consider it. judge newman and his jury
think it was tossed. that would have gotten him out of the circle i would hope but probably not because they ve been so focused on him. now, as i mentioned, alec asked multiple times, i think the testimony was five times, agent owen, agent owen, you know, if you get this data it will show i wasn t there. and you know we were we didn t learn why they didn t get it off alec s phone until very recently. you ll remember on june 10th, he gave s.l.e.d. his phone, yeah, you can copy it. please copy it because it will show that i wasn t driving my phone was not with maggie s phone at any point in time going down the road and i did what i said i did. well, they did extract it, but what we ve learned the extraction was a superficial extraction, not because alec
somebody he adored, correct? exactly, yes, sir. this was her testimony from the witness stand, and then in every trial there s you hope you find, you know, some very authentic witness, part of the fabric of america that comes in the courtroom, and we had in this case, and it s dale davis, and i want you to remember what dale testified about alec s relationship with his family. can we play davis s lovie dovey about alex and maggie, what did that mean? it means they loved each other. i mean, you described them as being lovey dovey, didn t you? yes. tell the jury what you meant by that. every time i was over there, you know, i ve never seen that man even raise his voice at his
she left, the blue tarp was laying out on ms. libby s rocking chair. that was her testimony. and so s.l.e.d. gets that, gets a search warrant, goes to alameda, and then sees a blue rain jacket. then sees a blue rain jacket, and when they did, they take that blue rain jacket, and they show it and just about everything they can think of, and it s defendant s 87, doug, if you pull it up, but they show this blue rain jacket to as many family members as they can get in contact with, and the rain jacket is and no one recognizes it. no one sees it. no said alex s ever worn it, no
they get a desire to win, so intoxicated by the attention that is brought on bit case that it, you know, they start going to a win at all cost approach. and i m going to go through some things that mr. waters stated to you that just aren t facts. and aren t supported by the facts and evidence that you heard. and before i do that, i want to give you a cautionary statement. we lawyers aren t witnesses. i didn t take an oath to stand up here and talk to you. i have ethical obligations about what i can say and limitations under the rules, but i m not a witness, i m here to talk to you about the evidence and the same applies to mr. waters. you decide what the evidence is. you decide. and