Pull over. You have to let me have the key in the car and the Engine Running and im not getting out. And the officer saying thats a good deal for me. That sounds like a fair deal. Im having a hard time with that. I also, you know, think back to what happened in north korea, and i remember the agreement that was hailed as, you know, the peace in our time of the Korean Nuclear agreement in north korea they were going to not have a Nuclear Weapon, and in fact i remember reading some of the editorial papers that basically said it was a huge victory against the war hawks and for the people that said diplomacy can never work. And a year later, north korea has Nuclear Weapons and thats something were dealing with today. That, i think, as a regime that is threatening as they are are probably less than the iranians got Nuclear Weapons. the trigger on receiving stations into early icy leads to unsuccess so would you have an example or a counter example maybe police pitcher early has helped or to
To new york city where brian is reporting the new development here tonight and the curfew moving a little bit earlier this morning, brian. Yeah, theyre moving the curfew to 8 00 p. M. Tomorrow and today it started at 11 00 p. M. And frankly they realize thats too late because they saw multiple multiple groups of hundreds and thousands of writers and other Peaceful Protesters we saw earlier just wreaking havoc on manhattan and they are still at this hour. Were now in the middle of manhattan and you know, here is a sign and think you heroes we love you. Were in the middle of the hardest hit area of the covid19 but then they supper here is the situation we are dealing with now and completely limited on madison avenue and you get a look inside. Everythings gone inside. This is the situation weve been dealing with and no other city has had the kind of coronavirus situation weve had here. Weve dealt with tremendous loss on the job side. Loss in terms of lives and all of that is happening, th
Candidates is a First Amendment fundamental right. It says that i was quoting buckley im sure or citing buckley to that effect. Then the question becomes what level of scrutiny should we apply to that case . Buckley suggests its something less than strict strikeout me in the First Amendment context for contributions. Thats the instruction that i as lower court judgev in the First Amendment context. But this was an equal protection challenge okay, saying its not just contributions its the inquality of contributions thats the problem here that this system favors Major Party Candidates over minor party candidates. And normally when we have a fundamental right in call protection analysis we apply strict scrutiny. I was placed in a situation where do you take this little less than strict strikeout me out of the First Amendment context and import it into the quality protection context or do you apply the normal strict scrutiny. And i pointed to two wonderful pins by judges in the area okay.