unless a court rules that his conversations with former president trump were not privileged. clark, you ll remember, was one of the doj officials who pushed the former president s bogus election fraud claims. he also draft add proposal for the justice department to announce investigations into the 2020 vote tally in georgia. cnn legal analyst jennifer rogers joins us now, a former federal prosecutor. that s interesting. he s basically saying the executive privilege argument. is that what happened today with jeffrey clark, and why is he so significant? he s significant, alisyn, because he was the one inside pushing for false information, pushing to tell georgia that they didn t have to certify and really trying to orchestrate a coup on the part of the justice department to help donald trump steal the president and remain in power. it sounds like he s experting executive privilege. the former president trump
welsh not only is it probably smart in the sense that so doing would only add to the speculation and the fight and would look bad. but all trump sounded ab their discussions. he probably already popped the seal on experting executive privilege. he s already described some of their communications. it would be hard for him to invoke privilege later. but remember, what happens wednesday and thursday with a couple days of testimony about this stuff. this is all the sound and the fury. this signifies nothing. this will be used endlessly by partisans on both sides. the real deal is what s going on behind the scenes with the mueller investigation. politic teugss are trying to spin different revelations. but the truth is that former fbi director mueller has the ball now, and that s the investigation that s gonna make the difference. real quickly, the travel ban came up. sanders was asked whether or not, is it a travel ban, what is it? he said he doesn t care, meaning the president, what yo