authors, lawmakers, philo philosophers, and the appeal for our perspective is this isn t a subscription service so it can t be censored by big tech, period. so it s always going to be there. you ve maybe seen a few minutes of some of these interviews here or there on our previous shows both netware going to show you a lot more, we are going to be focusing on just three people. also include country legend john rich, competitive swimmer riley gaines, who turned out to be enormously interesting and principled and tough, but first we speak to one of the clearest thinkers we know, victor davis hanson, frequently on our nighttime show, one of our favorite guests, and viewers are constantly asking us to hear more from victor davis hanson. so we re going to bring it to you now. in this first party tells us how he went from earning a phd to becoming a dirt farmer in california s central valley. really an interesting story. his story. and it begins here. i m in the same house, 15
meritocratic and diverse immigration it would work, as it always has with the italians and people tucker: when you say diverse, what you mean by that? we have 20,000, 34,000 from mexico, we have some from kenya, we have some from finland, you know, so we don t get a tribal block where people do not see others that are unlike themselves. tucker: so that is one of the big differences in our immigration scheme present, it s overwhelmingly from one region, one language, one ethnicity, whereas before, you know, it was from greece and france and germany and mexico. ted kennedy in the 1960s, he changed the immigration law, family unification rather than their credit, but that was a euphemism for change the demography to benefit the democratic party as the party of, you know, the patron, and these were going to be the peasants they were going to be indentured and they were going to show their fealty for expanded welfare.
Opinion: SmartVote Tibet- The underlying mechanics
By Tenzin Lekdhen
A prominent and prevalent issue in elections of all kinds is familiarity (unfamiliarity, for that matter) between voters and candidates regarding their views on social issues and political stands. SmartVote Tibet is an attempt to address that gap.
The online tool Smartvote Tibet launched earlier this week allows voters to evaluate prospective Presidential (Sikyong) and Parliamentary (Chithue) candidates in a “fact-based and informed way” by gauging their stand on various issues through questions that are gathered from the public. The platform is an adapted version of Smartvote, which was first developed in 2003 by Politools in Switzerland with operational success in numerous countries including Australia and countries in the EU.