sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa
at that underwriter bidenge i computer and the fbi will not anmputer and the fbi will not of an election again.o and then they proceeded to dowo uljust that. n 2016, they i would argue that in 2016 they unsuccessfully didn t change the outcome of the election. they tried to by exonerate hillarby exoney clinton.d but in 2020 sad to say, they did by suppressing information actively engaged in telling people like mark zuckerberg, facebook s mark zuckerberg proudly twitter.e of we don t have evidence of thatyh yet. but i think that wasat par wt oa the briefing ttoos of senator grassley to try and gett us off the off oer bf our undere investigation. so i think they re inves actually actively engaged intig interfering in our 2020ou election and they succeeded. we re going to get morand theye e to pgoing to get morand theye that, by the way.there and just to reiterates your point, there is polling after the election that indicated that that election would have changed had thatuppre informati