how changing just a single vote could have dramatic repercussions for the law in our country. i suspect the supreme court will be an important campaign issue as it well should be given the importance that the court plays in our life. reporter: normally the supreme court tries to avoid taking on a lot of highly political cases in the election year. court watchers say they tried to do that last year in the wake of justice kavanaugh s turbulent nomination, the cases have been piling up since then. it will be an interesting session to watch. jillian: interesting and thank you, garrett. we ll have much more with the legal panel coming up in a next few minutes. look forward to that. kansas city police are searching for a gunman who opened fire in a crowded bar overnight. motive unknown. the man is on the run. four people killed. christina coleman joins us with what police know. reporter: leland the preliminary police investigation reveals a
transgender or found out to be gay. whether the supreme court will agree with them will be quite interesting to watch. reporter: that ruling is being closely watched because it could impact cases around the country dealing with businesses that claim a religious liberty right to deny their services. one of the most closely watched cases deal with daca. the high court will decide whether the trump administration is able to move ahead with plans to end obama era protections for 800,000 people brought into the country illegally as children. up until now, federal appeals courts rejected administration arguments on this case. but the white house is hopeful that will change in this final ruling. all of these rulings are expected to come down in june in the thick of the presidential campaigns. like the last election, the high court is expected to be a major issue in 2020. i suspect the last few years have underscored the significance and importance of a single seat on the court.
val demmings and chris stew stuart. fox news sunday at top of the hour. don t miss it. jillian: immigration, executive power, abortion rights, job discrimination against lgbtq workers, some of the issues the supreme court will confront in the election year docket. the term kicks off monday. garrett tenney has a preview. reporter: the court may add issues dealing with gun control, religious liberty about and the environment. no shortage of hot button items on this term. first big one is this week on tuesday and deals with civil rights protections for lgbtq whether employers can be sued for job discrimination if they fire an employee coming out as gay or changing their gender. the issue title vii, which is the big employment discrimination law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex applies to situations where a person is terminated because they changed their sex,
experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. ask your doctor about the only gi-focused biologic just for ulcerative colitis and crohn s. entyvio. relief and remission within reach. . jillian: welcome back. fresh memories of the most contentious judicial nomination in memory. activists gathering at supreme court to mark one-year anniversary of the kavanaugh as the new supreme court justice. the high court kicks off tomorrow. the full docket awaits nine-member court, immigration, executive powerrer lgbtq in the work place, abortion, gun rights will being argued this term with rulings expected by late june, right knack r smack in the
this case the question is not a good idea to add to the law, but is the court right entity to do it? that is something should be reserved for the legislature f they are changing. jillian: what do you say. the law says because of sex. if i am person attracted to person of same sex that is because of section, if you fire me because of that if i present and adfy the gender difference from one assigned at birth, that is because of sex. it is really about the words that congress passed and applying them equally to our lgbtq colleagues, coworkers and neighbors. jillian: move on to the next which is immigration and executive power this is stemming from the process trying to phase out daca. where do you see this one going? this is real interesting case particularly the chief justice because certainly have the discretion in immigration areas