You look at the distribution of units santa clara approved almost 19 hundred singlefamily unit and krois approved 15 hundred and alameda approved 12 and alameda and krois have approximately 5 hundred thousand more residents than San Francisco and over 16 percent we only had 35 houses approved as singlefamily homes the reason people are leaving is because of that in parts of San Mateo County donates notice o not on the tables youve presented but on page 36 we have a shortage of Los Angeles Police department with you should make sure we build the kind of housing that families need and not try to cram too much on the parts of the land. And i was happy to see the big increase in affordable in this particular year as you mentioned unfortunately almost all of it is low and very low but theres very the being built for the middle only 10 percent for the Affordable Housing within the 19 percentage actually and people that make a little bit more their housing is not counted as Affordable Housing
Do it and what kind of financing is out there. Commissioner antonini. In terms of the whole question of future affordable even under construction theres a couple of big projects on valley part of transbay it has a higher percentage of affordable ii dont know. 35 percent. So you, you look at the approvals being done for transbay theyre going to be quite a few of the buildings that will be housing eye and 33 percent affordable by itself there are Oakland Army Base other areas of the city that staff can comment on that have those similar kind of qualifications for the percentages built. Okay. Thank you for your report. Thank you. Commissioners that places you on general Public Comment not to exceed a period of 15 minutes. At this time, members of the public may address the commission to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when afforded whe
The mayors goal and try to approve projects when we can commissioner sugaya. Yeah. Id like to on table 19 on page 22. Maybe its definesal b you al take 2013 we have a total of seven hundred and 12 units and a total of all new units at the 2439 my question is how does 2499 compare to table 21 on page 6 if you take 2013 i dont see where 2239 orients this is for all units that were produced looking at the positive. On table 2 units completed from new construction its not a correct number. That must have been a mistake so. It kicks up, up higher. One last question from 2009 to 2013 commissioner president wu pointed out the affordable it 22 percent is that expected to continue given the Mayors Initiative given the inclusionary the inclusionary percentage has dropped because of the veto so do we have any idea this can be sustained . Its a hard question the mayors goal is to sustain thirty percent a number of projects in the pipeline the question is its hard to know but the housing truth Fund
Whats particularly telling the projects starting around the savings time same time as the General Hospital when the cost of were lower. What supported the General Hospital staying on time and under budget was the fact their bids are not or went out earlier and our bids have been detailed we cant cry over split milk but its best we have as many have our best thinkers in the room in terms of how we can reduce some the costs so theres a major concern we know well get phase one done but not at the expense of the terminal d t x. Sir. Certainly we agree, of course, on the importance of phase two as we move forward with ptosis phase two we have not creating a situation we cant move forward with that phase but some of the things in the pipeline well have to bid toward a future bridge tolls some of the funds for the mel ruse. I mentioned the property tax increment that is committed to the project that flows from 2005 to 2050 and although the redevelopment agencies have been developed thats cons
Okay. Thank you mr. Rich. Okay. Colleagues this is for the sending this to the full board well take that without objection. That will be the order. Madam clerk call items 5 and 6 together item number 5 is an ordnance for the implementation of the Visitacion Valley schlage lock special used district and item 6 is amending the controls of the Visitacion Valley schlage lock district. Okay 5 and 6 supervisor cohen would you like to make introductory remarks. Briefly the item were going hearing today is the incentive thats taking over about 13 years in fact, weve had 18 meetings discussing Design Principles to control to the benefits due to the did he miss of the Redevelopment Agency it took several years of Community Planning for this planning crossing process to conclude. However, while lets see you i just want to call out that i have a few technical items to number 6 the special use district those railroad requested if he Planning Commission and they include two points id like to read in