hmm. you a reagan fan? taking down the picture yet? in the same speech, reagan described a letter he had received. an executive earning in six figures well above $100,000 a year. he wrote me in support of the tax plan because he said, i am legally able to take advantage of the present tax code, nothing dishonest, doing what the law prescribes and wind up paying a smaller salary than my secretary gets. or, i mean, paying a smaller salary. paying a smaller tax than my secretary pays. well, reagan messed up that line a little bit, but the message is clear. he didn t think a secretary should be paying a higher tax rate than her boss who makes a much higher income. until now, we ve been calling it the buffett rule. but we should be calling it the reagan rule.
burden while the special interests get a free ride. hmm. you a reagan fan? taking down the picture yet? in the same speech, reagan described a letter he had received. an executive earning in six figures well above $100,000 a year. he wrote me in support of the tax plan because he said, i am legally able to take advantage of the present tax code, nothing dishonest, doing what the law prescribes and wind up paying a smaller salary than my secretary gets. or, i mean, paying a smaller salary. paying a smaller tax than my secretary pays. well, reagan messed up that line a little bit, but the message is clear. he didn t think a secretary should be paying a higher tax rate than her boss who makes a much higher income. until now, we ve been calling it the buffett rule. but we should be calling it the