Conflict in city decision making. What this would create is a system thats parallel to whats been in service in los angeles for a number of years. Each time a commissioner appears on an agenda, there would be tools for the Commission Member to do that. The form would be filed with our office, and essentially, its a one to one relationship. If there are three recusals as listed here, filed within a 365day period, or a 1 of all matters that have been appearing on the agenda, that would be something that the commission would then review. And in reviewing that, the commission would look to things like is the number of recusals by a particular commissioner significant . It is the impact of the recusals significant, so these are questions that would be part or could be part of every review, and we envision that would be a report to the commission, the commission would have an opportunity to respond and to be able to have a discussion whether or not there is a repeated recusal in place that w
Conflict in city decision making. What this would create is a system thats parallel to whats been in service in los angeles for a number of years. Each time a commissioner appears on an agenda, there would be tools for the Commission Member to do that. The form would be filed with our office, and essentially, its a one to one relationship. If there are three recusals as listed here, filed within a 365day period, or a 1 of all matters that have been appearing on the agenda, that would be something that the commission would then review. And in reviewing that, the commission would look to things like is the number of recusals by a particular commissioner significant . It is the impact of the recusals significant, so these are questions that would be part or could be part of every review, and we envision that would be a report to the commission, the commission would have an opportunity to respond and to be able to have a discussion whether or not there is a repeated recusal in place that w
It would be for an organization with which he or she is associated. So my i think in the interest of order, in terms of roberts rules of record as well, at this point, since weve had significant discussion, since there was a motion and we havent had a second yet, im going to ask my colleagues whether or not there is a second to commissioner chuis motion to amend and take out the language anything of value. Being no second, the motion dies. Commissioner chui . [please stand by] okay. So in regard to this particular part, there was no action anticipated, we need not take Public Comment since were not going to vote, and well move now onto the next item, which is the item relating to repeated recusals, and we have a presentation relating to that. Yeah. I will set this up, explain just briefly what these amendments are, and then, director pellum will speaks to why theyre here. Section 3. 209 sets up a procedure for the commission to review repeated recusals, to tto so the amendments that ar
You throw some of these irs are other bureaucrats in jail, you wont have the scandals again. Nobody is getting fired. Those are three things to strengthen governments to restore our freedom. [applause] frank you are critical of the press. They are sitting right in front of you. Hes right there. Governor jindal which one . Frank im not choosing. Its your right to choose. What are you critical of . Governor jindal i am critical when the Mainstream Media dont apply the same standards to this president they apply to the rest of us. [applause] [applause] frank that is the first question i should not have asked. [laughter] in my normal role, i would actually then give the people a chance to respond and i dont have that opportunity. Governor jindal they get lots of responses. I know what the stories will say tomorrow. If we nominate a republican that wants to be liked by the media and wants to be liked by the establishment and wants to go to the cool cocktail parties, we are done. [applause]
Speak at that convention on tuesday night and about 1. 5 hours before he spoke him i was backstage and these people came out before me. They were Small Business people. They were all cheering and they had placards at the Convention Hall saying we built that. They were sticking it to obama by saying Small Business did not create on jobs. We sent Small Business person after Small Business person out there for one hour talking about how they built their business. We did not send a single worker on stage. Not one. Why would they think we are for them . Why would they think we care about what they are going through . We never talk about it and we dont put programs together and policies together that directly impact them. The reason i was the only i think the only person in this race to ever win in a president ial year in a state that is a blue state that the president republican nominee lost and so on the election. I know there is a lot of folks in this race for governors who are running in