Put themselves on the same. Board with these scoundrels, and they all understand this, they understand this perfectly in israel, there, all the illusions of some special relations with putin and russia have already ended, israel understood that russia, as it was traditionally during the years of the soviet union, remained israels mortal enemy. Andrii andriyovych, this is how we understand that in general export of chaos, export, export of violence and export of war has always remained key in what is called. The russian federation, yes, well, but to some extent they always tried to save the socalled middle eastern card for some more global trades. Well, it is clear that the sponsors of this event were two, two combat allies, iran, and russia, two fascist states, and this is very positive for the world Public Opinion of the concept, finally, of russia, now , first of all, in the american world. In the consciousness of the whole west, now these two parallel cases, fascist iran wants to de
Will he fail . Now it seems that nothing will succeed, and all diplomatic efforts to somehow do something in the middle east, at least to agree on peace between saudi arabia and israel, are futile. Yes, unfortunately, saudi arabia clearly took a not entirely proisrael position, respectively, no completely proamerican position. After all , it turns out that china is using them for its negotiations with iran and generally closer ones. Contacts with china were not in vain, now they really act more like a neutral player, or even a prochinese player, on the other hand, we see certain achievements in other countries of the region, we see that jordan is ready to provide its airfields and its infrastructure for american planes, we see that the epic with egypt is not yet over, which, although it also tries not to take part in anything, to get out of american pressure, but the Americans Still have their own means of putting pressure on him, that is, saudi arabia , unfortunately, so far it is a d
Happen, and therefore this is an opportunity for the party. The party really wanted to draw attention to those people who might not have voted for this particular party, but it was necessary to draw some new card, and this new card was ukraine, of course, when you look on this side, for example, well, as i look at it from lithuania, it is a little wild for me, because well, we all do, and all of poland and the poles are very supportive of ukraine, and to play with that, but to drag it into the elections and into the preElection Campaign, it was a little strange, and thats why i dont see that the polish experts themselves, its not me im not talking about myself, or there are experts from ukraine or lithuania, the polish experts themselves say that it was actually a very dirty campaign, because they dragged everything possible, even for example, i dont know, some new laws on almost aliens, which more related to tusks party and so on, well, it wasnt pretty, and the ukrainian issue was ver
So on and so forth, therefore, purely within the limits of management logic, it is justified to create a new organization externally, which will have a certain period for preparation, which will have a certain period in order to build new processes and structures, to recruit for these processes in these structures of people on the basis of both the anticorruption component and the professional component, so that when this procurement function is transferred to this new institution, we have a qualitatively different result of their activity. Uh, arsen, we understand that the agency is kind of a subsidiary body for the department of defense, right , and its a body that uh, its a body thats going to have certain defined powers, and within those powers, its going to do all that , that is placed on it, that is, it is an unhelpful structure in the sense that it is not it is clear what the agency will do, for example, in the conditional tomorrow and the day after tomorrow, and in order not to
Investments, protection of these. Investments, verification of control over these investments, so that they are aimed directly at the creation of new models of armed military equipment, that is, there are certain problems, and i see that they are moving, but again, it is desirable that the movements were much faster, but i listened to you carefully, i have such the question arose, we are talking about the mechanisms of the correct market economy, which our foreign partners are used to, and now we take our reality. Hostilities, the need for armed forces and the feeling that, on the contrary, a rigid system of management in the format of a military economy is possible, which has not yet started in our country, could be more productive, these two realities , can they really be combined in ukraine, because one option is market, the other, lets say, rigid management, which is more effective in your opinion, where we are now we have to make the main points, a difficult question, you know, bu