Less attainabletoday the later , Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Nicholas Kristof and sheryl wu dont report on the issues facing the working class in rural america. An enjoyable tv now and over the weekend on cspan2. Great to sit down with you and your book, dont be evil is contained plenty on a timely subject given the political times we are in , given the heights that the stocks of apple, amazon, google and facebook and others have reached but you normally have a pretty broad scope to your coverage. Why is this book, why now mark. At you for having me by the way. I started this book i guess it was in 2017. And i had just taken a job as a columnist for the Financial Times and my mandate was to figure out are the worlds biggest business and economic stories and cover them in opinion form is a rather large mandate and in order for the to narrow the funnel i started looking through wealth figures and i thought i saw an amazing numbers in terms of how well to transition to the technolog
Types to control this hes with me and sexism culminating in a damning report on chauvinists that marketing. Officer apologizing unilever has said its now to change its ways its released new adverts advocating inclusive ety it wants facebook to follow suit or else lets face it though unilever probably wont drop one of its biggest advertising platforms money talks but the story probably has generated some good p. R. That butyl uber as any company is primary responsibility is to make money for its shareholders to turn a profit and sometimes p. R. Initiatives like this are part of it there are just an effort to elevate your brand i think it would be difficult for them as a company that makes Consumer Products to avoid advertising one of the most prominent platforms today but what about the central actor in the whole story. I spoke the platform has shown commitment to the battle against fate can use and abuse but the floodgates have now been truly opened on the pressure left right and cente
Was not just sanctions it was an eligibility issue i understand the reaction of the public in russia because it doesnt seem logical exactly the russian side doesnt see the logic here how is stripping a person of the right to compete at the olympics not a sanction this is. A special procedure because the created a special commission so the cast by the here reviewed these criteria and said they were fair please let me get this straight the tsotsi case and the chain case your saying that there are absolutely no contradictions between the two decisions yes the fact that you cannot establish the give evidence of the deal doesnt mean that you have established the innocence of the athlete you see what i mean im sorry but i thought that was the exact job of cas to determine whether that suspicion is enough for that kind of bad maybe that there are suspicions which are notes. Confirmed by sufficient evidence i dont know if im clear because its a little bit skopec ated that is you can have some
Public by intelligence agencies American Public has been misled intentionally or not by its Intelligence Community many times like i am im thinking w m ds in iraq for instance since the consequences of that are still felt fifteen years or so why are a whole hearted face in what the intelligence is telling them about russia now especially what youre saying its a fact but every time russia asks to show them the facts they they they they are unable to provide them. Just like with iraq i think thats a legitimate i think thats a legitimate accusation sophie to the extent that it puts pressure on the u. S. Intelligence community to do something its hard to do which is to present the if you will the secret facts or the story i dont even know frankly the secret story because i dont have a reason i need to know that as a retired cia officer however if they do present the facts theres a risk of of compromising what we call sources and our methods which would of course not not be good so the ques
Leading the charge even threatening to reduce and withdraw advertising from the social media platform if things dont improve. Unilever will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children or which create division in society consumers do care about fraudulent practice fake news and russians influencing the us election they do care when they see their brands being placed next to ads funding terror or exploiting children now the message is clear no more deception abuse and controversy and a new era of positivity unity and includes everybody but a closer look at unilevers own p. R. Record reveals a contentious history from this infamous dove soap placed on facebook triggering a storm of accusations of racism to fair and lovely Skin Lightening Products marketed across asia spawning allegations of perpetuating racist colonial stereotypes to control us hes with me and sexism culminating in a damning report on chauvinists that marketing. Officer apologizing unilever ha