President trump on this decision. Welcome to the program. Glad to have you. Great to be here. Sean you and a lot of prominent judicial scholars were asked to look for certain candidates that fit this meaning of a constitutionalist, and originalist. Maybe some americans are hearing this term for the first time. How would you best define those terms and differentiate a regionalism from Judicial Activism . First of all, the way to think about it is a judge has a deep sense of fairness and a sense of impartiality. When he is grounded in text and Original Meaning Of The Constitution, she is putting the text and the original meeting ahead of any political predisposition he may have. Thats the way a judge cases. Fairly and partially without regard to your own predispositions or prejudices. Sean a judicial activist assembly of a liberal put a liberal would want on the court . Somebody believes that the constitution is a living and Breathing Document that they have the right to almost legislate
exactly is thought. the fact that the president selected him as his nominee and a case that is so important in terms of contemporary issues tell us where donald trump is on this particular issue and how important it is to him. sean: he also weighed in on the second amendment, he respects it, writing that there is a long tradition of lung spread gun ownership by private individuals in this country and the supreme court has held the second amendment to own firearms not beyond friendship. he used the actual text of the constitution. he was referring to that one case, that was a layup in my view of a decision. the the thing is the right to die, euthanasia book, it informs
a case that is so important in terms of contemporary issues tell us where donald trump is on this particular issue and how important it is to him. sean: he also weighed in on the second amendment, he respects it, writing that there is a long tradition of widespread gun ownership by private individuals in this country and thetr supreme court has held the second amendment to own firearms not beyond fringe. he used the actual text of the constitution. he was referring to that one case, that was a layup in my view of a decision. the the thing is the right to die, euthanasia book, it informs us of his views on life, liberty, the pursuit of thappiness.