rights. under a new bill of rights, the government would be able to ignore injunctions from the court in strasbourg, which has nothing to do with the european union. last week the court blocked ministers from sending asylum seekers to rwanda. here s our political editor, chris mason. i would deputy prime minister unveiled his new bill in parliament today. i unveiled his new bill in parliament toda . ., unveiled his new bill in parliament toda . . , ., ., ., ., today. i am proud of our world speaking judiciary today. i am proud of our world speaking judiciary and - today. i am proud of our world speaking judiciary and what i today. i am proud of our world i speaking judiciary and what else today. i am proud of our world - speaking judiciary and what else is the point of a supreme court if it vows insubordination to a european one. , , ., ., vows insubordination to a european one. they shadowjustice minister
macron, on the other, le pen, while she s come back from more skeptic positions of the last few years still wants to see europe reformed, in order to panic a much looser alliance of sovereign nations. translator: let me say to emmanuel macron there is no european sovereignty, because there is no european people. there is a sovereignty when there is a people. there is a french sovereignty. there is no european sovereignty, and i understood that you wish to replace france with european sovereignty. you have done it symbolically by replacing the french flag with the european one. changing a club on your own by reducing your membership phoebe saying i choose my rules well, either, the others follow you because that s europe. there are 27 of us around the table. or you go your one way. and what you describe in your program sounds like going your own way. the second thing you propose is
it sounds like what you re saying is like president macron that the europeans should increase their own military capacity, and that. not against nato. i think that a strong nato needs two legs. the american one and the european one. that s not the case for the moment. you ve got some people on one side of the argument like andreas michaelis, german ambassador to the uk, saying the aukus partnership threatened the coherence and unity of the west. then you ve got people like shal michele, saying the trans atlantic alliance between the eu and the us is paramount for security in the world. we have never put it into question in europe. there s a slight differing of tone, isn t there, within the eu now? no, no. the quote of shal michele is correct. this alliance is necessary, including to face the new challenges in the world, including to face the terrorism in the world. precisely because we need this
macron that the europeans should increase their own military capacity, and that. not against nato. i think that a strong nato needs two legs. the american one and the european one. that s not the case for the moment. you ve got some people on one side of the argument like andreas mikaelis, german ambassador to the uk, saying the aukus partnership threatened the coherence and unity of the west. then you ve got people like shal michele, saying the tra ns atla ntic alliance between the eu and the us is paramount for security in the world. we have never put it into question in europe. there s a slight differing of tone, isn t there, within the eu now? no. the quote of shal michele is correct. this alliance is necessary, including to face the new challenges in the world, including to face the terrorism in the world. precisely because we need this alliance, we need trust
there s a difference of view there, because within the european union, people like the us european alliance. but i like the us european alliance. but an alliance is not an allegiance. it sounds like what you re saying is like president macron that the europeans should increase their own military capacity, and that. not against nato. i think that a strong nato needs two legs. the american one and the european one. that s not the case for the moment. you ve got some people on one side of the argument like andreas mikaelis, german ambassador to the uk, saying the aukus partnership threatened the coherence and unity of the west. then you ve got people like shal michele, saying the trans atlantic alliance between the eu and the us is paramount for security in the world. we have never put it into question in europe. there s a slight differing of tone, isn t there, within the eu now?