Made thank you very much. Im leslie a member of the Eureka Valley and Land Use Committee id like to read a letter if ellen former wanting of the association dagger or Dear Commission the catalyst and the potrero Eureka Valley Neighborhood Association has reviewed the topic of the permit operation at 3 to ord street the Eureka Valley Neighborhood Association was the record of the supervisor wiener department of Human Services passed if 2013 it didnt meet the basic scale and size determined by the sgmdz we ask the Planning Commission deny this for a conditional use permit than you. Im wrapping up you recognize a lot of our faces weve come back time and times again about the projects in our neighborhood i have this visible Health Talking about why you see the same people i know weve even few months a new project the interim controls they came up as drs now cus were disappoint the Planning Department is recommending this project in our minds the intent the sgmz here one tiny portion of cit
Committee id like to read a letter if ellen former wanting of the association dagger or Dear Commission the catalyst and the potrero Eureka Valley Neighborhood Association has reviewed the topic of the permit operation at 3 to ord street the Eureka Valley Neighborhood Association was the record of the supervisor wiener department of Human Services passed if 2013 it didnt meet the basic scale and size determined by the sgmdz we ask the Planning Commission deny this for a conditional use permit than you. Im wrapping up you recognize a lot of our faces weve come back time and times again about the projects in our neighborhood i have this visible Health Talking about why you see the same people i know weve even few months a new project the interim controls they came up as drs now cus were disappoint the Planning Department is recommending this project in our minds the intent the sgmz here one tiny portion of city two culdesacks two 6 very large developments that are proposed are underway t
Employees are not rhine around not being supervised. Also the applicant said he didnt let his employees assess the Surveillance System only the manager. Fair enough. How about the thirty day duration are you comfortable with the thirty days the applicant his system doesnt hold thirty days. Yes. Im comfortable with thirty days. He can adjust it i mean either i think 15, 20 or thirty. So. Okay. So on the motion to approve this permit with the police conditions have decided to keep it with employees or supervisor how did you want that changing the employees to manager on that motion. Commissioner frost commissioner lee commissioner joseph commissioner perez commissioner hyde. Good luck. The motion carries. Okay. So moving right along is 4 to nothing giants. Thank you. This is joe. Org at remedy r room per room it was the office of the city administrator its launch and mr. Garvey took it over mostly a bar but times events for private parties come on up mr. Garvey. Good evening so i took to
Commission. All right so i move to approve and the only wording in the police conditions i want to change is item number 3 the word employees should be changed to manager thats my motion. Do we have a second. Ill second. All right. So on the motion to approve. Hold on i do want to say i did want to have that conversation about the permit ill say we have said that employees are responsible inform assess and operate the Surveillance Video and the reason t is if the Police Medical cannabis come and the manager is not there so were going to make them have those the employee should be able. Our Good Neighbor policy says if someone in charge a manager with the cell phone has to be on site at all times when the permit is being used correct me am i right or wrong. Youre right. Theres got to be one responsible person there the employees are not rhine around not being supervised. Also the applicant said he didnt let his employees assess the Surveillance System only the manager. Fair enough. How
To impose. The question is thats one thing we can do. Im trying to get to whether we can make a motion today so we know what we are getting. Is it possible to say on a condition of approval that this project would adhere to our signage guidelines separate and part from the formula retail legislation rather than saying its up to it needs to comply with the signage requirements. So i think perhaps the condition that the project sponsor would further work with on the department on the location of the signage. Its my understanding of this use that there are distinctions between each of the locations even though its formula retail, thats part of the nuance of it that they do make distinctions between the different locations. Okay, working with staff, we already have our guidelines as lights and things. Okay. Excellent. Commissioners, condition no. 4 under design, it does say signage, any signs on the property shall be made to comply with the requirements of article 6 of the planning code if