they say? what s their response? they they say that there s no national security concern. they ve told us that they have properly vetted the fufu corporation and they see no problem with it, which just simply isn t true. well, just two months ago, we again sounded the alarm after the committee on foreign investment said it didn t have jurisdiction to block this mill s construction. let me put this very bluntly. the committee that congress mandated and gave the authority to protect america s national security is allowing a chinese business with ties to beijing. that means the ccp to operate mere miles from an american military installation. was general austin. how about meely? well, tonight, after months of pressure, the ap is reporting just hours ago that the u.s. air force has now told north dakota leaders that full fang s plans do pose a significant threat to national security, prompting city officials to say they ll move to stop the project once and for all. we re
election. we also that the grand jury waaa empaneled by a soros funded d.a. called alvin bragg, who looks and acts like ta tawanna brawley era, alvidenc sharpton. so we would assumee on the bass of that evidence that it s pretty likely trump does get charged with something at some point. but charged with what? in a fre that s the question. that should matter in a free country, laws or universal laws apply to all citizens equally precisely because all citizens i are considered equal forou generations. this was very obviouss to ami to american liberals. in fact, iact was the basis ofel their worldview that was back when liberals opposedas jim crow.om and we re notet tryinhing cg to reinstate it as something called equitequiy. we are not liberals, but we retain the traditional american view, which is that laws must be applied equally or else they are not laws at all. justice must be blind or elsejut it is tyranny. so we spent the day with helpp f staff toyer on our staff t
out a message p to them to get ready to protesr any arrests, indictments, etth cetera, that he may have. so he s basically talking to the crowd was the oath keepers, cuellar and kkk?. oh, jan ziggs, the only really organized group on january six was the fbi, ofit course.hee but consider the idea and whereh it s coming from.ere it s this is ma this is maxine waters. lady this is the lady who cheered on the l.a. race riotson three decades ago. this is the very same person just a few years ago. we said and we re quoting, if u see anybody from the trump cabinet in a restaurant, inne a department store, at a gasoline station, she s very get create a crowd and you push back on get out and create a crowd them back on them and you tell her they re not welcome anymore, anywhere . basically, neckless them. okay, magazine. but she s a democrat. is just a civil rights exercise. so these are this is justotecte a civil rights exercise. d fromshe s protected from domec terrorism charges. and
at the presidential level what s happening with the party, that we havaves more more candidates and more of an r electorate that looks more like femaleamerica, more females, more candidates of color, etth cetera. i do think she s going to be the nominee ate some pointo mentioned where she got hers big. do i think she s going to begoin the nominee? no, i think that somebody will have to consider her an run against kamala harris and absolutely annihilate kamala harris. nirris in to debate.aim butht i think it s too earlyn tn to claim the nominee. alsoow, i don t know that it sut a two person race. t i think until you go out mix to iowa, and mix it up with the people in new hampshire, mix ite up with the people, we don thapn i was going to happen. but the democrats are flate flat on their backs. remember, barack obama, is o democracy is on the ballot, not on the democratic side. t you re stuck with joe bidenh and kamala harris because you keep lying. everybody that they had a greabi t mid