it s perhaps a four-way race. rangel against history, if you will. he s been there so long. you can t imagine congress without him. but things change. of course, he s had ethics problem in a last few years. it s been humiliating and knocked him off the pedestal, to some extent. and people supporting espaillat said it s time for a change and time to move on. polls are open until 9:00 p.m. could be a close race down to the wire. last time it was contested not only within 1,000 votes but contested as well. we ll see. thank you. more developing news on capitol hill. john boehner making it clear he fully intends to be the house speaker next year. for many of the year there are questions swirling over whether he would continue holding the job in the house. and the speculation intensified. this is what a speerk boehner
ethics problem, in order to keep up the lifestyle of she and her husband, anthony weiner, and she was drawing a paycheck from the taxpayers and a larger check from the private firm as the same time she was in government services, just astonishing to me. karl rove, making a legit point that maybe weiner s wife is more than just a victim, that her standing by her man may be as much of a political and practical and professional decision as it is a personal choice, and to continue with the guest, the former d.c. guest, mayor marion barry, and then gayle is the wife of pastor ted haggard, who stepped down after
that story. and so the menendez re-election campaign carried on as best it could as if nothing happened. and on november 6th, senator menendez won re-election with 59% of the vote. a 20 point lead over his republican challenger. the daily caller kept pushing prostitution stories about senator menendez after the election. and for the most part, the mainstream media, including this program, continued to ignore them, because as you can see in that video the journalistic standards applied to the case. at the daily caller, were shall we say unorthodoxed and experimental. there has been much coverage in the new york times of senator menendez ethics problem. the times and others have covered the senators
a 20 point lead over his republican challenger. the daily caller kept pushing prostitution stories about senator menendez after the election. and for the most part, the mainstream media, including this program, continued to ignore them, because as you can see in that video the journalistic standards applied to the case. at the daily caller, were shall we say unorthodoxed and experimental. there has been much coverage in the new york times of senator menendez ethics problem. the times and others have covered the senators uncomfortably close relationship with a campaign contributor. the times has not included anything of the contributions. late today, the washington post posted this headline. escort says menendez
cancer free bounds after the blast of chemotherapy and this explains why. something is getting released out of the dying cancer cells that is in the nominal cells and it is helping more cancer cells grow. so it is complicated. if you take that big shotgun, shoot it in a cancer cell, you are causing a lot of havoc. ethics problem, don t stop taking your chemotherapy. people are coming up to me, should i do something different? no, only one study. it works but it does not work long time. you get the initial benefit and you have to go back and take it again, don t stop the chemotherapy yet. we have learned two things. the you can use lower doses probably so you do not release so much of the chemical that stimulates the cancer cells to regrow. that would be beneficial. and you have to get something