The consent calendar seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner antonini. Move to approve item 2 second. Commissioners there is a motion and a second with that commissioner antonini. Commissioner hillis. Councilmember johnson. Commissioner moore. Commissioner sugaya. Commissioner president wu. So moved, commissioners, that motion passes that motion passes 6 to zero that place you under commission matters i want to welcome commissioner johnson we look forward to working with you. Commissioner moore welcome commissioner johnson i want to tell you a story which i hope inspires director ram to do the same. I read something in the paper that made me laugh supervisor farrell sponsored a scholarship two scholarships each a thousand dollars for students for the San Francisco State University to find outdated city laws im sure that mr. Sanchez will find this people came forward with the minimum wage, however, supervisor farrell choice two students who identified two very, very funny la
Comment on that item . Move to continue item one until september 11th and second. Commissioners a motion and second to continue on that motion. Commissioner antonini. Commissioner hillis. Councilmember johnson. Commissioner moore. Commissioner sugaya and commissioner president wu. So moved, commissioners, that motion passes 6 to zero and places you under your consent calendar all matter listed are considered to be routine may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items there will be no separate discussion of these items of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. Item 2 case 2013 c at 836 irving street request for conditional use there are no speaker cards. Is there any Public Comment on item 2 inaudible . The consent calendar seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner antonini. Move to approve item 2 secon
ADVERTISEMENT
Apple Hit With Biometric Suit Over Products ID Features
Law360 (June 30, 2021, 7:51 PM EDT) Apple has been hit with an Illinois state court lawsuit by a proposed class of consumers who say the Touch ID and Face ID features on the technology giant s iPhones, iPads and MacBooks violate Illinois privacy law by collecting their biometric data without their informed consent.
Lead plaintiffs and Illinois residents David Barnett, Ethel Burr and Michael Henderson allege that Apple has extracted their biometric information for those features, which use fingerprint and facial recognition technology as a means of authentication, without first obtaining their written permission, as required by the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. Apple also failed to make BIPA-required disclosures.